Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38457366›Full record

ArticlePloS one2024

Assessment of emissions and potential occupational exposure to carbon monoxide during biowaste composting.

Karolina Sobieraj, Karolina Giez, Jacek A Koziel, Andrzej Białowiec

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Karolina SobierajDepartment of Applied Bioeconomy, Wrocław University of Environmental and Life Sciences, Wrocław, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-6901-8354
Karolina GiezDepartment of Applied Bioeconomy, Wrocław University of Environmental and Life Sciences, Wrocław, Poland.
Jacek A KozielUSDA-ARS Conservation and Production Research Laboratory, Bushland, Texas, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-2387-0354
Andrzej BiałowiecDepartment of Applied Bioeconomy, Wrocław University of Environmental and Life Sciences, Wrocław, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-5871-2129

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To date, only a few studies focused on the carbon monoxide (CO) production during waste composting; all targeted on CO inside piles. Here, the CO net emissions from compost piles and the assessment of worker's occupational risk of exposure to CO at large-scale composting plants are shown for the first time. CO net emissions were measured at two plants processing green waste, sewage sludge, or undersize fraction of municipal solid waste. Effects of the location of piles (hermetised hall vs. open yard) and turning (before vs. after) were studied. Higher CO net emission rates were observed from piles located in a closed hall. The average CO flux before turning was 23.25 and 0.60 mg‧m-2‧h-1 for hermetised and open piles, respectively, while after- 69.38 and 5.11 mg‧m-2‧h-1. The maximum CO net emissions occurred after the compost was turned (1.7x to 13.7x higher than before turning). The top sections of hermetised piles had greater CO emissions compared to sides. Additionally, 5% of measurement points of hermetised piles switched to 'CO sinks'. The 1-h concentration in hermetised composting hall can reach max. ~50 mg CO∙m-3 before turning, and >115 mg CO∙m-3 after, exceeding the WHO thresholds for a 1-h and 15-min exposures, respectively.

Indexed as

CompostingOccupational ExposureCarbon MonoxideSoilSolid WasteCarbon MonoxideSoilSolid Waste

Identifiers

PMID38457366
PMCPMC10923444

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.