Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38457120›Full record

ArticleCanadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique2024

The human health effects of unconventional oil and gas development (UOGD): A scoping review of epidemiologic studies.

Amira M Aker, Michael Friesen, Lisa A Ronald, Mary M Doyle-Waters, Tim K Takaro, Willow Thickson, Karen Levin, Ulrike Meyer, Elyse Caron-Beaudoin, Margaret J McGregor

Erratum issuedAbstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Canadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Health risks of oil and gas development.Nature reviews. Nephrology · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Impact of oil and gas boom and busts on working-age mortality in the U.S.Environmental epidemiology (Philadelphia, Pa.) · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Sociodemographic and Population Exposure to Upstream Oil and Gas Operations in Canada.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2024
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Amira M AkerUniversité Laval, CHU de Quebec - Université Laval, Québec, QC, Canada.
Michael FriesenFaculty of Health Sciences, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC, Canada.
Lisa A RonaldFaculty of Health Sciences, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC, Canada.
Mary M Doyle-WatersCentre for Clinical Epidemiology and Evaluation, Vancouver Coastal Health Research Institute, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Tim K TakaroFaculty of Health Sciences, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC, Canada.
Willow ThicksonDepartment of Family Practice, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
Karen LevinEmerald Environmental Consulting, Kent, OH, USA.
Ulrike MeyerDepartment of Family Practice, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
Elyse Caron-BeaudoinDepartment of Health and Society and Department of Physical and Environmental Sciences, University of Toronto Scarborough, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Margaret J McGregorCentre for Clinical Epidemiology and Evaluation, Vancouver Coastal Health Research Institute, Vancouver, BC, Canada. mrgret@mail.ubc.ca.ORCID 0000-0002-0553-7240

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveUnconventional oil and gas development (UOGD, sometimes termed "fracking" or "hydraulic fracturing") is an industrial process to extract methane gas and/or oil deposits. Many chemicals used in UOGD have known adverse human health effects. Canada is a major producer of UOGD-derived gas with wells frequently located in and around rural and Indigenous communities. Our objective was to conduct a scoping review to identify the extent of research evidence assessing UOGD exposure-related health impacts, with an additional focus on Canadian studies.

methodsWe included English- or French-language peer-reviewed epidemiologic studies (January 2000-December 2022) which measured exposure to UOGD chemicals directly or by proxy, and where health outcomes were plausibly caused by UOGD-related chemical exposure. Results synthesis was descriptive with results ordered by outcome and hierarchy of methodological approach. SYNTHESIS: We identified 52 studies from nine jurisdictions. Only two were set in Canada. A majority (n = 27) used retrospective cohort and case-control designs. Almost half (n = 24) focused on birth outcomes, with a majority (n = 22) reporting one or more significant adverse associations of UOGD exposure with: low birthweight; small for gestational age; preterm birth; and one or more birth defects. Other studies identified adverse impacts including asthma (n = 7), respiratory (n = 13), cardiovascular (n = 6), childhood acute lymphocytic leukemia (n = 2), and all-cause mortality (n = 4).

conclusionThere is a growing body of research, across different jurisdictions, reporting associations of UOGD with adverse health outcomes. Despite the rapid growth of UOGD, which is often located in remote, rural, and Indigenous communities, Canadian research on its effects on human health is remarkably sparse. There is a pressing need for additional evidence.

Indexed as

Epidemiologic StudiesCanadaEnvironmental ExposureHumansHydraulic FrackingOil and Gas IndustryEnvironmental justiceFrackingHydraulic fracturingIndigenousUnconventional oil and gas development

Identifiers

PMID38457120
PMCPMC11133301

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.