ArticleMedical & biological engineering & computing2024
Direct lingam and visibility graphs for analyzing brain connectivity in BCI.
Article in Medical & biological engineering & computing, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The brain-computer interface (BCI) is a direct pathway of communication between the electrical activity of the brain and an external device. The present paper was aimed to investigate directed connectivity between different areas of the brain during motor imagery (MI)-based BCI. For this purpose, two methods were implemented including, Limited Penetrable Horizontal Visibility Graph (LPHVG) and Direct Lingam. The visibility graph (VG) is a robust algorithm for analyzing complex systems such as the brain. Direct Lingam uses a non-Gaussian model to extract causal links which is appropriate for analyzing large-scale connectivity. First, LPHVG map MI-EEG (electroencephalogram) signals into networks. After extracting the topological features of the networks, a support vector machine classifier was applied to categorize multi-classes MI. The network of all classes was found to be different from one another, and the kappa value of classification was 0.68. The degree sequence of LPHVG was calculated for each channel in order to obtain the direction of brain information flow. Transfer entropy (TE) is used to compute the relations of the channel degree sequence. Therefore, the directed graph between channels was formed. This method is called LPHVG_TE directed graph. The Bayesian network, also known as the Direct LiNGAM model, was implemented for the second method. Finally, images of the LPHVG and Direct Lingam were classified by convolutional neural network (CNN). In this study, Data sets 2a of BCI competition IV was used. The outcomes reveal that the brain network developed by LPHVG (92.7%) might be more effective to distinguish 4 classes of MI than the Direct Lingam (90.6%) and it was shown that graph theory has the potential to get better efficiency of BCI.
Indexed as
Identifiers
38457065What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.