Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38457017›Full record

Observational studyInternational urology and nephrology2024

Effect of different alpha-receptor antagonists on metabolic parameters: a head-to-head comparison.

Lütfullah Caştur, Mehmet Uzunlulu, Erhan Eken, Muhammed Çiçek, Ahmet Tahra, Özgür Efiloğlu, Bekir Demirtaş, Asıf Yıldırım

Abstract readObservational StudyComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Observational study in International urology and nephrology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Lütfullah CaşturIstanbul Mehmet Akif Ersoy Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery Training and Research Hospital Department of İnternal Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3908-6780
Mehmet UzunluluDepartment of İnternal Medicine, Istanbul Medeniyet University, Göztepe Prof. Dr. Süleyman Yalçın City Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8754-1069
Erhan EkenDepartment of İnternal Medicine, Istanbul Medeniyet University, Göztepe Prof. Dr. Süleyman Yalçın City Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey. erhan-eken@hotmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8602-5940
Muhammed ÇiçekDepartment of Urology, Istanbul Medeniyet University, Göztepe Prof. Dr. Süleyman Yalçın City Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5478-3352
Ahmet TahraDepartment of Urology, Istanbul Medeniyet University, Göztepe Prof. Dr. Süleyman Yalçın City Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5158-5630
Özgür EfiloğluDepartment of Urology, Istanbul Medeniyet University, Göztepe Prof. Dr. Süleyman Yalçın City Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4757-803X
Bekir DemirtaşDepartment of Urology, Istanbul Medeniyet University, Göztepe Prof. Dr. Süleyman Yalçın City Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0410-8866
Asıf YıldırımDepartment of Urology, Istanbul Medeniyet University, Göztepe Prof. Dr. Süleyman Yalçın City Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3386-971X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeAlthough it is known that alpha-adrenergic receptor antagonists have positive effects on metabolic parameters such as glucose metabolism, lipid profile, and insulin sensitivity, it is unclear whether this is a class effect. Tamsulosin is reported to have adverse effects on glucose metabolism and insulin resistance, and this may be because of its lack of glycolysis-enhancing effect compared with other alpha-adrenergic receptor antagonists with glycolysis-enhancing effects such as doxazosin, terazosin, and alfuzosin. The aim of this study was to compare the effect of tamsulosin on metabolic parameters with another alpha-1 adrenergic receptor antagonist, doxazosin.

methodsIn this prospective, observational, controlled, 12-week clinical study, a total of 60 male patients aged ≥ 40 years who were first started on tamsulosin (n = 30; 0.4 mg/day, oral; mean age, 59.20 ± 8.97 years) or doxazosin (n = 30; 4 or 8 mg/day, oral; mean age, 58.50 ± 8.93 years) for benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) or lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) were enrolled. The groups were compared according to the changes in anthropometric and biochemical parameters (glycemia, lipid profile, and insulin sensitivity) at the end of treatment.

resultsIn intragroup analyses, systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, total cholesterol, and HbA1c levels decreased significantly in the doxazosin group compared with baseline (p < 0.05 for all), while no significant change was observed in the tamsulosin group. In comparisons between groups, systolic blood pressure, total cholesterol, and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels showed a significant decrease in the doxazosin group compared with the tamsulosin group (percent change: - 6.68 ± 13.08 vs. 0.53 ± 11.02, p = 0.025; - 3.63 ± 9.56 vs. 4.02 ± 10.86, p = 0.005; and - 5.62 ± 18.18 vs. 5.24 ± 15.42, p = 0.015, respectively).

conclusionAlthough these results do not support previous findings that tamsulosin has adverse effects on metabolic parameters, they suggest that doxazosin treatment may be a reason for preference in patients with BPH or LUTS accompanied by metabolic disorder.

Indexed as

Adrenergic alpha-1 Receptor AntagonistsDoxazosinProstatic HyperplasiaTamsulosinAgedBlood GlucoseGlycated HemoglobinHumansInsulin ResistanceLower Urinary Tract SymptomsMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesSulfonamidesAdrenergic alpha-1 Receptor AntagonistsBlood GlucoseDoxazosinGlycated HemoglobinSulfonamidesTamsulosinBenign prostatic hyperplasiaDoxazosinLower urinary tract symptomsMetabolic effectTamsulosin

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.