Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38456932›Full record

ArticleSocial psychiatry and psychiatric epidemiology2024

Shaping tomorrow's support: baseline clinical characteristics predict later social functioning and quality of life in schizophrenia spectrum disorder.

Jiasi Hao, Natalia Tiles-Sar, Tesfa Dejenie Habtewold, Edith J Liemburg, Genetic Risk Outcome of Psychosis (GROUP) Investigators, Richard Bruggeman, Lisette van der Meer, Behrooz Z Alizadeh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Social psychiatry and psychiatric epidemiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Jiasi HaoDepartment of Epidemiology, University Medical Centre Groningen, University of Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, 9713 GZ, Groningen, The Netherlands. j.hao@umcg.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9625-742X
Natalia Tiles-SarDepartment of Epidemiology, University Medical Centre Groningen, University of Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, 9713 GZ, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Tesfa Dejenie HabtewoldDepartment of Epidemiology, University Medical Centre Groningen, University of Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, 9713 GZ, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Edith J LiemburgDepartment of Psychiatry, University Medical Centre Groningen, University Centre for Psychiatry, Rob Giel Research Centre, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Genetic Risk Outcome of Psychosis (GROUP) Investigators
Richard BruggemanDepartment of Psychiatry, University Medical Centre Groningen, University Centre for Psychiatry, Rob Giel Research Centre, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Lisette van der MeerDepartment of Clinical and Developmental Neuropsychology, Faculty of Behavioural and Social Sciences, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Behrooz Z AlizadehDepartment of Epidemiology, University Medical Centre Groningen, University of Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, 9713 GZ, Groningen, The Netherlands. b.z.alizadeh@umcg.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1415-8007

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeWe aimed to explore the multidimensional nature of social inclusion (mSI) among patients diagnosed with schizophrenia spectrum disorder (SSD), and to identify the predictors of 3-year mSI and the mSI prediction using traditional and data-driven approaches.

methodsWe used the baseline and 3-year follow-up data of 1119 patients from the Genetic Risk and Outcome in Psychosis (GROUP) cohort in the Netherlands. The outcome mSI was defined as clusters derived from combined analyses of thirteen subscales from the Social Functioning Scale and the brief version of World Health Organization Quality of Life questionnaires through K-means clustering. Prediction models were built through multinomial logistic regression (Model

resultsWe identified five mSI subgroups: "very low (social functioning)/very low (quality of life)" (8.58%), "low/low" (12.87%), "high/low" (49.24%), "medium/high" (18.05%), and "high/high" (11.26%). The mSI was robustly predicted by a genetic predisposition for SSD, premorbid adjustment, positive, negative, and depressive symptoms, number of met needs, and baseline satisfaction with the environment and social life. The Model

conclusionWe introduced and distinguished meaningful subgroups of mSI, which were modestly predictable from baseline clinical characteristics. A possibility for early prediction of mSI at the clinical stage may unlock the potential for faster and more impactful social support that is specifically tailored to the unique characteristics of the mSI subgroup to which a given patient belongs.

Indexed as

Quality of LifeSchizophreniaAdultFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMiddle AgedNetherlandsPsychiatric Status Rating ScalesPsychosocial FunctioningPsychotic DisordersSchizophrenic PsychologySocial AdjustmentSocial SupportSurveys and QuestionnairesClusterPredictionPsychosisRecoverySchizophreniaSocial exclusionSocial inclusion

Identifiers

PMID38456932
PMCPMC11464570

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.