Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38456877›Full record

ArticleJACC. Cardiovascular imaging2024

AI-Defined Cardiac Anatomy Improves Risk Stratification of Hybrid Perfusion Imaging.

Robert J H Miller, Aakash Shanbhag, Aditya Killekar, Mark Lemley, Bryan Bednarski, Paul B Kavanagh, Attila Feher, Edward J Miller, Timothy Bateman, Valerie Builoff and 5 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in JACC. Cardiovascular imaging, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Revisiting Perfusion in the Forgotten Right Ventricle: Artificial Intelligence-Enhanced Quantification on PET/CT.Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Impact of disease-modifying therapy on [European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Ejection fraction quantification from ungated chest CT by AI.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2025
    Article
  6. The REgistry of Flow and Perfusion Imaging for Artificial Intelligence with positron emission tomography (REFINE PET):Rationale and design.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. AI-enabled CT-guided end-to-end quantification of total cardiac activity in 18FDG cardiac PET/CT for detection of cardiac sarcoidosis.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2025
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. The Updated Registry of Fast Myocardial Perfusion Imaging with Next-Generation SPECT (REFINE SPECT 2.0).Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2024
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Deep Learning-Enabled Quantification ofJournal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2024
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Holistic AI analysis of hybrid cardiac perfusion images for mortality prediction.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Robert J H MillerDepartment of Medicine (Division of Artificial Intelligence in Medicine), Imaging, and Biomedical Sciences, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA; Department of Cardiac Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary Alberta, Canada.
Aakash ShanbhagDepartment of Medicine (Division of Artificial Intelligence in Medicine), Imaging, and Biomedical Sciences, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA; Signal and Image Processing Institute, Ming Hsieh Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Aditya KillekarDepartment of Medicine (Division of Artificial Intelligence in Medicine), Imaging, and Biomedical Sciences, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Mark LemleyDepartment of Medicine (Division of Artificial Intelligence in Medicine), Imaging, and Biomedical Sciences, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Bryan BednarskiDepartment of Medicine (Division of Artificial Intelligence in Medicine), Imaging, and Biomedical Sciences, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Paul B KavanaghDepartment of Medicine (Division of Artificial Intelligence in Medicine), Imaging, and Biomedical Sciences, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Attila FeherSection of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA; Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.
Edward J MillerSection of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA; Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.
Timothy BatemanCardiovascular Imaging Technologies LLC, Kansas City, Missouri, USA.
Valerie BuiloffDepartment of Medicine (Division of Artificial Intelligence in Medicine), Imaging, and Biomedical Sciences, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Joanna X LiangDepartment of Medicine (Division of Artificial Intelligence in Medicine), Imaging, and Biomedical Sciences, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA.
David E NewbyBritish Heart Foundation Centre for Cardiovascular Science, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
Damini DeyDepartment of Medicine (Division of Artificial Intelligence in Medicine), Imaging, and Biomedical Sciences, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Daniel S BermanDepartment of Medicine (Division of Artificial Intelligence in Medicine), Imaging, and Biomedical Sciences, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Piotr J SlomkaDepartment of Medicine (Division of Artificial Intelligence in Medicine), Imaging, and Biomedical Sciences, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA. Electronic address: Piotr.Slomka@cshs.org.

Funding

Yale Clinical and Translational Science Award (U Component)UL1TR001863 · NCATS · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI John H. Krystal, LUCILA OHNO-MACHADO · 2016 to 2026
$102.9M
Patient-specific Outcome Prediction from Cardiovascular Multimodality Imaging by Artificial IntelligenceR35HL161195 · NHLBI · CEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL CENTER · PI Piotr J Slomka · 2022 to 2026
$5.0M
British Heart Foundation CH/09/002/26360NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001863NHLBI NIH HHS R35 HL161195Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundComputed tomography attenuation correction (CTAC) improves perfusion quantification of hybrid myocardial perfusion imaging by correcting for attenuation artifacts. Artificial intelligence (AI) can automatically measure coronary artery calcium (CAC) from CTAC to improve risk prediction but could potentially derive additional anatomic features.

objectivesThe authors evaluated AI-based derivation of cardiac anatomy from CTAC and assessed its added prognostic utility.

methodsThe authors considered consecutive patients without known coronary artery disease who underwent single-photon emission computed tomography/computed tomography (CT) myocardial perfusion imaging at 3 separate centers. Previously validated AI models were used to segment CAC and cardiac structures (left atrium, left ventricle, right atrium, right ventricular volume, and left ventricular [LV] mass) from CTAC. They evaluated associations with major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs), which included death, myocardial infarction, unstable angina, or revascularization.

resultsIn total, 7,613 patients were included with a median age of 64 years. During a median follow-up of 2.4 years (IQR: 1.3-3.4 years), MACEs occurred in 1,045 (13.7%) patients. Fully automated AI processing took an average of 6.2 ± 0.2 seconds for CAC and 15.8 ± 3.2 seconds for cardiac volumes and LV mass. Patients in the highest quartile of LV mass and left atrium, LV, right atrium, and right ventricular volume were at significantly increased risk of MACEs compared to patients in the lowest quartile, with HR ranging from 1.46 to 3.31. The addition of all CT-based volumes and CT-based LV mass improved the continuous net reclassification index by 23.1%.

conclusionsAI can automatically derive LV mass and cardiac chamber volumes from CT attenuation imaging, significantly improving cardiovascular risk assessment for hybrid perfusion imaging.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceComputed Tomography AngiographyCoronary Artery DiseaseMyocardial Perfusion ImagingPredictive Value of TestsSingle Photon Emission Computed Tomography Computed TomographyVascular CalcificationAgedCoronary AngiographyCoronary CirculationCoronary VesselsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPrognosisartificial intelligencehybrid imagingmyocardial perfusion imaging

Identifiers

PMID38456877
PMCPMC11222053

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.