Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38456732›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America2024

Discrimination and sensorimotor adaptation of self-produced vowels in cochlear implant users.

Agudemu Borjigin, Sarah Bakst, Katla Anderson, Ruth Y Litovsky, Caroline A Niziolek

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Agudemu BorjiginWaisman Center, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin 53705, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3242-8653
Sarah BakstWaisman Center, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin 53705, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3502-6158
Katla AndersonWaisman Center, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin 53705, USA.
Ruth Y LitovskyWaisman Center, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin 53705, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6221-937X
Caroline A NiziolekWaisman Center, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin 53705, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6085-1371

Funding

Directional Hearing in Complex Auditory EnvironmentsR01DC003083 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI LITOVSKY, RUTH Y · 2004 to 2020
$7.4M
Waisman Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities Research Center Down Syndrome RegistryU54HD090256 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI POLLAK, SETH D · 2016 to 2020
$6.0M
Interdisciplinary Training in Speech-Language DisordersT32DC005359 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI ELLIS-WEISMER, SUSAN · 2002 to 2019
$3.7M
CCI-Mobile: Signal Processing Advancements for Cochlear Implant Users in Naturalistic EnvironmentsR01DC016839 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS DALLAS · PI HANSEN, JOHN H.L., LITOVSKY, RUTH Y · 2018 to 2022
$3.6M
Binaural processing and hearing in children with cochlear implantsR01DC020355 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI Ruth Y Litovsky · 2023 to 2026
$2.3M
Neural markers of speech error detection and correction abilities in aphasiaR00DC014520 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI NIZIOLEK, CAROLINE · 2017 to 2019
$747k
Speech error detection with degraded auditory representationsF32DC017653 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI BAKST, SARAH · 2019 to 2020
$102k
NICHD NIH HHS U54 HD090256NIDCD NIH HHS F32 DC017653NIDCD NIH HHS R00 DC014520NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC003083NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC016839NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC020355NIDCD NIH HHS T32 DC005359
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Humans rely on auditory feedback to monitor and adjust their speech for clarity. Cochlear implants (CIs) have helped over a million people restore access to auditory feedback, which significantly improves speech production. However, there is substantial variability in outcomes. This study investigates the extent to which CI users can use their auditory feedback to detect self-produced sensory errors and make adjustments to their speech, given the coarse spectral resolution provided by their implants. First, we used an auditory discrimination task to assess the sensitivity of CI users to small differences in formant frequencies of their self-produced vowels. Then, CI users produced words with altered auditory feedback in order to assess sensorimotor adaptation to auditory error. Almost half of the CI users tested can detect small, within-channel differences in their self-produced vowels, and they can utilize this auditory feedback towards speech adaptation. An acoustic hearing control group showed better sensitivity to the shifts in vowels, even in CI-simulated speech, and elicited more robust speech adaptation behavior than the CI users. Nevertheless, this study confirms that CI users can compensate for sensory errors in their speech and supports the idea that sensitivity to these errors may relate to variability in production.

Indexed as

Cochlear ImplantationCochlear ImplantsSpeech PerceptionAuditory PerceptionHumansSpeech

Identifiers

PMID38456732
PMCPMC11527478

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.