Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38456459›Full record

SynthesisJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA2024

Learning competing risks across multiple hospitals: one-shot distributed algorithms.

Dazheng Zhang, Jiayi Tong, Naimin Jing, Yuchen Yang, Chongliang Luo, Yiwen Lu, Dimitri A Christakis, Diana Güthe, Mady Hornig, Kelly J Kelleher and 6 more

Abstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Moving forward on the science of informatics and predictive analytics.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Dazheng ZhangThe Center for Health AI and Synthesis of Evidence (CHASE), University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA 19104, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-1431-0785
Jiayi TongThe Center for Health AI and Synthesis of Evidence (CHASE), University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA 19104, United States.
Naimin JingDepartment of Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA 19104, United States.
Yuchen YangDepartment of Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA 19104, United States.
Chongliang LuoDepartment of Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA 19104, United States.
Yiwen LuThe Center for Health AI and Synthesis of Evidence (CHASE), University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA 19104, United States.
Dimitri A ChristakisSeattle Children's Research Institute, Seattle, WA 98101, United States.
Diana GütheSurvivor Corps, Washington, DC 20814, United States.
Mady HornigDepartment of Epidemiology, Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health, New York, NY 10032, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-7572-3092
Kelly J KelleherResearch Institute at Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, OH 43205, United States.
Keith E MorseDivision of Pediatric Hospital Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA 94304, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-8307-1642
Colin M RogersonDepartment of Pediatrics, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN 46202, United States.
Jasmin DiversDepartment of Foundations of Medicine, New York University Long Island School of Medicine, Mineola, NY 11501, United States.
Raymond J CarrollDepartment of Statistics, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843, United States.
Christopher B ForrestApplied Clinical Research Center, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA 19104, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-1252-068X
Yong ChenThe Center for Health AI and Synthesis of Evidence (CHASE), University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA 19104, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-0835-0788

Funding

OTA-21-015A Post-Acute Sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 Infection Initiative: NYU Langone Health Clinical Science Core, Data Resource Core, and PASC Biorepository CoreOT2HL161847 · NHLBI · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI GROSS, RACHEL SHARON, HORWITZ, LEORA · 2021 to 2025
$651.0M
PANDA-MSD: Predictive Analytics via Networked Distributed Algorithms for Multi-System DiseasesU01TR003709 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI BIAN, JIANG, CHEN, YONG · 2022 to 2025
$4.7M
TRiPOD: Toward Reusable Phenotypes in Observational Data for AD/ADRD - managing definitions and correcting biasR01AG073435 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI CHEN, YONG, XU, HUA · 2021 to 2025
$3.9M
Dynamic learning for post-vaccine event prediction using temporal information in VAERSR01AI130460 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCI CTR HOUSTON · PI CHEN, YONG, TAO, CUI · 2017 to 2021
$3.4M
ClinEX - Clinical Evidence Extraction, Representation, and AppraisalR01LM014344 · NLM · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI Yong Chen, Yifan Peng · 2023 to 2026
$2.7M
PheBC: bias correction methods for EHR derived phenotypeR01LM013519 · NLM · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI CHEN, YONG, XU, HUA · 2021 to 2024
$1.6M
Advancing Drug Repositioning for Alzheimer’s Disease using Real-world DataR56AG069880 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI BIAN, JIANG, CHEN, YONG · 2021 to 2022
$1.6M
CICADA: clinical informatics and computational approaches for drug-repositioning of AD/ADRDR56AG074604 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI CHEN, YONG, TAO, CUI · 2021 to 2022
$1.5M
A General Framework to Account for Outcome Reporting Bias in Systematic ReviewsR01LM012607 · NLM · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI CHEN, YONG · 2017 to 2020
$1.4M
AI-ADRD: Accelerating interventions of AD/ADRD via Machine learning methodsR01AG077820 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI Jiang Bian, Yong Chen · 2026 to 2026
$737k
Surrogate Augmented Deep Predictive Learning for Retinopathy of PrematurityR21EY034179 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI CHEN, YONG, HE, LIFANG · 2023 to 2023
$482k
Methods for Estimating Disease Burden of Seasonal InfluenzaR21AI167418 · NIAID · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI CHANG, HOWARD H, CHEN, YONG · 2023 to 2024
$443k
NCATS NIH HHS U01 TR003709NEI NIH HHS R21 EY034179NHLBI NIH HHS OT2 HL161847NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI130460NIAID NIH HHS R21 AI167418NIA NIH HHS R01 AG073435NIA NIH HHS R01 AG077820NIA NIH HHS R56 AG069880NIA NIH HHS R56 AG074604NIH HHS OT2HL161847-01NLM NIH HHS R01 LM012607NLM NIH HHS R01 LM013519NLM NIH HHS R01 LM014344Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo characterize the complex interplay between multiple clinical conditions in a time-to-event analysis framework using data from multiple hospitals, we developed two novel one-shot distributed algorithms for competing risk models (ODACoR). By applying our algorithms to the EHR data from eight national children's hospitals, we quantified the impacts of a wide range of risk factors on the risk of post-acute sequelae of SARS-COV-2 (PASC) among children and adolescents. MATERIALS AND

methodsOur ODACoR algorithms are effectively executed due to their devised simplicity and communication efficiency. We evaluated our algorithms via extensive simulation studies as applications to quantification of the impacts of risk factors for PASC among children and adolescents using data from eight children's hospitals including the Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Children's Hospital of Colorado covering over 6.5 million pediatric patients. The accuracy of the estimation was assessed by comparing the results from our ODACoR algorithms with the estimators derived from the meta-analysis and the pooled data.

resultsThe meta-analysis estimator showed a high relative bias (∼40%) when the clinical condition is relatively rare (∼0.5%), whereas ODACoR algorithms exhibited a substantially lower relative bias (∼0.2%). The estimated effects from our ODACoR algorithms were identical on par with the estimates from the pooled data, suggesting the high reliability of our federated learning algorithms. In contrast, the meta-analysis estimate failed to identify risk factors such as age, gender, chronic conditions history, and obesity, compared to the pooled data. DISCUSSION: Our proposed ODACoR algorithms are communication-efficient, highly accurate, and suitable to characterize the complex interplay between multiple clinical conditions.

conclusionOur study demonstrates that our ODACoR algorithms are communication-efficient and can be widely applicable for analyzing multiple clinical conditions in a time-to-event analysis framework.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsHospitalsAdolescentChildComputer SimulationHumansReproducibility of ResultsRisk Factorscommunication-efficientcompeting risk modeldistributed research networkfederated learningone-shot distributed algorithm

Identifiers

PMID38456459
PMCPMC11031234

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.