Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38456163›Full record

ArticleSAGE open medicine2024

Lymph node harvesting after laparoscopic complete mesocolic excision colectomy in colon cancer with practical application of glacial acid, absolute ethanol, water, and formaldehyde solution: A prospective cohort study.

Minh Thao Nguyen, Cong Thuan Dang, Tran Bao Song Nguyen, Nguyen Cuong Pham, Dinh Duong Le, Minh Duc Pham, Huu Tri Nguyen, Dinh Tuan Dung Phan, Doan Van Phu Nguyen, Thanh Phuc Nguyen and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in SAGE open medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 95% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Minh Thao NguyenAnatomy and Surgical Training Department, Hue University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Hue University, Hue City, Vietnam.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0311-2019
Cong Thuan DangPathology Department, Hue University of Medicine and Pharmacy Hospital, Hue University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Hue University, Hue City, Vietnam.
Tran Bao Song NguyenPathology Department, Hue University of Medicine and Pharmacy Hospital, Hue University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Hue University, Hue City, Vietnam.
Nguyen Cuong PhamPathology Department, Hue Central Hospital, Hue City, Vietnam.
Dinh Duong LeFaculty of Public Health, Hue University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Hue University, Hue City, Vietnam.
Minh Duc PhamDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Hue University of Medicine and Pharmacy Hospital, Hue University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Hue University, Hue City, Vietnam.
Huu Tri NguyenAnatomy and Surgical Training Department, Hue University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Hue University, Hue City, Vietnam.
Dinh Tuan Dung PhanDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Hue University of Medicine and Pharmacy Hospital, Hue University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Hue University, Hue City, Vietnam.
Doan Van Phu NguyenDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Hue University of Medicine and Pharmacy Hospital, Hue University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Hue University, Hue City, Vietnam.
Thanh Phuc NguyenAnatomy and Surgical Training Department, Hue University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Hue University, Hue City, Vietnam.
Phuoc Vung DoanDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Hue University of Medicine and Pharmacy Hospital, Hue University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Hue University, Hue City, Vietnam.
Dinh Son NguyenAnatomy and Surgical Training Department, Hue University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Hue University, Hue City, Vietnam.
Anh Vu PhamDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Hue University of Medicine and Pharmacy Hospital, Hue University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Hue University, Hue City, Vietnam.
Hue University · VNHue Central Hospital · VN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: Quality of surgery has recently become an essential topic in the prognosis of colon cancer. Complete mesocolic excision for colon cancer has recently gained popularity with high-quality surgery. Patient specimens after complete mesocolic excision with central vessel ligation procedures have an integrity of the mesocolon and the yield of three fields of lymph node harvest. We apply the glacial acid, absolute ethanol, water, and formaldehyde solution to each specimen based on the Japanese classification of lymph node groups and station numbers. We aim to identify the distribution and status of lymph node metastasis according to each tumor site and some pathological characteristics related to this disease. Methods: A prospective cohort study was performed on 45 laparoscopic complete mesocolic excision surgery patients. Results: 2791 lymph nodes were harvested after complete mesocolic excision surgery. The average number was 62.0 ± 22.3 nodes. The mean tumor size (in the largest dimension) was 4.2 ± 1.8 cm. The average length of the resected bowel segments was 29.1 ± 7.7 cm. There are 63 (2.3%) node metastases in 2791 lymph nodes, in which 17/45 (37.8%) patients had pN(+). The minimum positive node size was 1 mm. The positive pericolic lymph nodes (station 1) accounted for the highest rate, with 53 nodes (1.9%). The number of lymph nodes in young age ⩽60 is more significant than in older. The results were similar, with a more significant node retrieval in the group with a tumor size >4.5 cm and specimen length >25 cm. The number of lymph nodes in lower tumor invasive (pT1,3) was smaller than pT4. Our research shows that the cecum, ascending, and descending colon had greater nodes than others, with a mean number of 78.6, 74.2, and 71.3, respectively. Conclusions: The metastasis and harvested lymph nodes accounted for the highest rate of colon cancer in station 1 and the lowest rate in station 3. The number of retrieved lymph nodes was significantly associated with tumor location, size, specimen length, and patient age.

Indexed as

CMEcolon cancerGEWFharvestingLymph noderetrieval

Identifiers

PMID38456163
PMCPMC10919137
OpenAlexW4392507993

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.