ArticleLe infezioni in medicina2024
Risk factors for therapeutic failure in adults with methicillin-resistant
Article in Le infezioni in medicina, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
- Antimicrobial Resistance in Major Gram-Positive Pathogens: Beyond the Vancomycin Border.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To determine the risk factors associated with therapeutic failure of vancomycin in hospitalized adult patients with methicillin-resistant Design: Case-control study. Setting: Conducted in a high complexity hospital in Cali, Colombia. Participants: Adult hospitalized from January 1, 2015, to December 31, 2021, with MRSA infections with confirmed microbiological isolation. Methods: Cases were patients with therapeutic failure of vancomycin (mortality, poor clinical improvement, change of antibiotic used, early relapse, or persistence of positive blood cultures) and control patients were those who did not present failure. Significant variables from the bivariate analysis were included in a multiple analysis with an asymmetric logistic regression model. Results: A total of 105 patients were included in the study, 28 in the treatment group and 77 in the control group. The median age was 49 years and 59 (56%) of participants were men. The following variables: age (OR 1.034; 95% CI 1.007-1.061, p=0.011), osteomyelitis/ septic arthritis (OR 6.035; 95% CI 2.282-15.956, p=0.000) and minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) (OR 5.971; 95% CI 1.321-26.979, p=0.020) were found to be independent risk factors associated with therapeutic failure of vancomycin. Vancomycin trough levels were not different between cases and controls (OR 0.976; 95% CI 0.911-1.044, p=0.478). Conclusions: When a multiple analysis was performed to control for confounding factors, only 3 variables were found to be significant and were considered risk factors for therapeutic failure of vancomycin in adult patients with MRSA infection: age, MIC, and osteomyelitis/ septic arthritis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.