ArticleFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology2024
Automatic segmentation of skeletal muscles from MR images using modified U-Net and a novel data augmentation approach.
Article in Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Magnetic Resonance Imaging Segmentation of Soft Tissue in the Diagnosis of Chronic Low Back Pain: A Scoping Review.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- A generalisation study in deep learning-based segmentation of lower-limb muscles across different populations.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Intra- and inter-rater reliability of skeletal muscle mass MRI assessment among adults: a systematic review.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2026Review
- MRI image segmentation of the major lower leg muscles using deep learning: application in biomechanical analysis.Medical & biological engineering & computing · 2026Article
- A deep learning algorithm for automatic 3D segmentation and quantification of hamstrings musculotendon injury from MRI.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Deep learning-based electrical impedance spectroscopy analysis for malignant and potentially malignant oral disorder detection.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Developments in Deep Learning Artificial Neural Network Techniques for Medical Image Analysis and Interpretation.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- AI driven analysis of MRI to measure health and disease progression in FSHD.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- A novel mean shape based post-processing method for enhancing deep learning lower-limb muscle segmentation accuracy.PloS one · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Rapid and accurate muscle segmentation is essential for the diagnosis and monitoring of many musculoskeletal diseases. As gold standard, manual annotation suffers from intensive labor and high inter-operator reproducibility errors. In this study, deep learning (DL) based automatic muscle segmentation from MR scans is investigated for post-menopausal women, who normally experience a decline in muscle volume. The performance of four Deep Learning (DL) models was evaluated: U-Net and UNet++ and two modified U-Net networks, which combined feature fusion and attention mechanisms (Feature-Fusion-UNet, FFU, and Attention-Feature-Fusion-UNet, AFFU). The models were tested for automatic segmentation of 16-lower limb muscles from MRI scans of two cohorts of post-menopausal women (11 subjects in PMW-1, 8 subjects in PMW-2; from two different studies so considered independent datasets) and 10 obese post-menopausal women (PMW-OB). Furthermore, a novel data augmentation approach is proposed to enlarge the training dataset. The results were assessed and compared by using the Dice similarity coefficient (DSC), relative volume error (RVE), and Hausdorff distance (HD). The best performance among all four DL models was achieved by AFFU (PMW-1: DSC 0.828 ± 0.079, 1-RVE 0.859 ± 0.122, HD 29.9 mm ± 26.5 mm; PMW-2: DSC 0.833 ± 0.065, 1-RVE 0.873 ± 0.105, HD 25.9 mm ± 27.9 mm; PMW-OB: DSC 0.862 ± 0.048, 1-RVE 0.919 ± 0.076, HD 34.8 mm ± 46.8 mm). Furthermore, the augmentation of data significantly improved the DSC scores of U-Net and AFFU for all 16 tested muscles (between 0.23% and 2.17% (DSC), 1.6%-1.93% (1-RVE), and 9.6%-19.8% (HD) improvement). These findings highlight the feasibility of utilizing DL models for automatic segmentation of muscles in post-menopausal women and indicate that the proposed augmentation method can enhance the performance of models trained on small datasets.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.