ArticleGeburtshilfe und Frauenheilkunde2024
Is There a Cumulative Effect for Congenital Heart Defects in Monochorionic Twins after Assisted Reproduction? - A Retrospective Analysis at a Tertiary Referral Center.
Article in Geburtshilfe und Frauenheilkunde, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Effects of assisted reproductive techniques on offspring cardiovascular health: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2026Review
- Neonatal Health Following IVF: Own Versus Donor Material in Singleton and Multiple Pregnancies.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Ultrasonographic findings in mid-trimester adolescent pregnancy: prevalence and risk of abnormalities.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: The aim of our study was to compare maternal, chorionicity and neonatal complications in monochorionic (MC) twins between spontaneously conceived (SC) and assisted reproductive technologies (ART) pregnancies. Material and Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study between January 2010 to December 2019 at a tertiary referral University center. All consecutive pregnancies with MC twins that delivered at our University hospital were included. Maternal, chorionicity and neonatal complications were recorded and compared between SC and ART pregnancies. Results: 393 MC pregnancies were included for final analysis, including 353 (89.8%) SC and 40 (10.2%) pregnancies conceived after ART. Hypothyroidism was the only maternal condition seen significantly more often in ART pregnancies (35.0% vs 12.5%, p = 0.001). There were no significant differences in chorionicity complications, such as twin-twin transfusion syndrome, selective fetal growth restriction and twin anemia-polycythemia sequence (40.0% in ART pregnancies vs 31.6% in SC pregnancies, p = 0.291). At least one congenital anomaly in one twin was seen significantly more often in ART pregnancies (18.8% vs 8.1%, p = 0.004), especially congenital heart defects (16.3% vs 6.2%, p = 0.005). There were no other significant differences in neonatal outcomes between both groups, however, there were non-significant trends in gestational age at delivery (34 weeks in ART pregnancies vs 35 weeks, p = 0.078) and birthweight (1951 g ± 747 in ART pregnancies vs 2143 g ± 579, p = 0.066). Conclusion: This is the largest cohort study to date comparing maternal, chorionicity and neonatal complications between MC twin pregnancies after ART and after SC. Hypothyroidism was the only maternal condition occurring more frequently in pregnancies conceived after ART. There were no significant differences in chorionicity complications, in contrast to previously reported studies. While MC twins and ART pregnancies per se are known to be at risk for congenital heart defects, there seems to be a cumulative effect in MC pregnancies conceived after ART.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.