Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38455948›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in epidemiology2023

Prognostic algorithms for post-discharge readmission and mortality among mother-infant dyads: an observational study protocol.

Matthew O Wiens, Jessica Trawin, Yashodani Pillay, Vuong Nguyen, Clare Komugisha, Nathan Kenya-Mugisha, Angella Namala, Lisa M Bebell, J Mark Ansermino, Niranjan Kissoon and 5 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in epidemiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05730387 (Smart Discharges for Mom & Baby), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05730387 completednot on this map

Smart Discharges for Mom & Baby: Saving Mother-newborn Dyads by Developing a Predictive Risk Model to Identify Vulnerable Dyads and Guide Delivery of Evidence-based, Locally-informed Interventions for Targeted Post-discharge Care

TypeobservationalSponsorUniversity of British ColumbiaRan2022 to 2024Enrolled7,182ConditionsMaternal Sepsis, Neonatal SepsisArmsObservational only
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Matthew O WiensInstitute for Global Health, BC Children's and Women's Hospitals, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Jessica TrawinInstitute for Global Health, BC Children's and Women's Hospitals, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Yashodani PillayInstitute for Global Health, BC Children's and Women's Hospitals, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Vuong NguyenInstitute for Global Health, BC Children's and Women's Hospitals, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Clare KomugishaWALIMU, Kampala, Uganda.
Nathan Kenya-MugishaWALIMU, Kampala, Uganda.
Angella NamalaDepartment of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, Jinja Regional Referral Hospital, Jinja, Uganda.
Lisa M BebellDepartment of Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, Medical Practice Evaluation Center, Center for Global Health, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States.
J Mark AnserminoInstitute for Global Health, BC Children's and Women's Hospitals, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Niranjan KissoonInstitute for Global Health, BC Children's and Women's Hospitals, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Beth A PayneDigital Health Research, BC Children's Hospital Research Institute, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Marianne VidlerDepartment of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Astrid Christoffersen-DebDepartment of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Pascal M LavoieDepartment of Pediatrics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Joseph NgonziDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Mbarara University of Science & Technology, Mbarara, Uganda.
University of British Columbia · CAHarvard University · USJinja Hospital · UGMbarara University of Science and Technology · UG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: In low-income country settings, the first six weeks after birth remain a critical period of vulnerability for both mother and newborn. Despite recommendations for routine follow-up after delivery and facility discharge, few mothers and newborns receive guideline recommended care during this period. Prediction modelling of post-delivery outcomes has the potential to improve outcomes for both mother and newborn by identifying high-risk dyads, improving risk communication, and informing a patient-centered approach to postnatal care interventions. This study aims to derive post-discharge risk prediction algorithms that identify mother-newborn dyads who are at risk of re-admission or death in the first six weeks after delivery at a health facility. Methods: This prospective observational study will enroll 7,000 mother-newborn dyads from two regional referral hospitals in southwestern and eastern Uganda. Women and adolescent girls aged 12 and above delivering singletons and twins at the study hospitals will be eligible to participate. Candidate predictor variables will be collected prospectively by research nurses. Outcomes will be captured six weeks following delivery through a follow-up phone call, or an in-person visit if not reachable by phone. Two separate sets of prediction models will be built, one set of models for newborn outcomes and one set for maternal outcomes. Derivation of models will be based on optimization of the area under the receiver operator curve (AUROC) and specificity using an elastic net regression modelling approach. Internal validation will be conducted using 10-fold cross-validation. Our focus will be on the development of parsimonious models (5-10 predictor variables) with high sensitivity (>80%). AUROC, sensitivity, and specificity will be reported for each model, along with positive and negative predictive values. Discussion: The current recommendations for routine postnatal care are largely absent of benefit to most mothers and newborns due to poor adherence. Data-driven improvements to postnatal care can facilitate a more patient-centered approach to such care. Increasing digitization of facility care across low-income settings can further facilitate the integration of prediction algorithms as decision support tools for routine care, leading to improved quality and efficiency. Such strategies are urgently required to improve newborn and maternal postnatal outcomes. Clinical trial registration: https://clinicaltrials.gov/, identifier (NCT05730387).

Indexed as

dischargematernal healthneonatal healthpost-dischargesepsis

Identifiers

PMID38455948
PMCPMC10911031
OpenAlexW4389149498

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.