Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38455923›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in epidemiology2023

Patterns of care and survival for lung cancer: Results of the European population-based high-resolution study.

Milena Sant, Caterina Daidone, Kaire Innos, Rafael Marcos-Gragera, Katrijn Vanschoenbeek, Miguel Rodriguez Barranco, Ester Oliva Poch, Roberto Lillini, Lung Cancer HR Study Working Group

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in epidemiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Milena SantAnalytical Epidemiology and Health Impact Unit, Department of Epidemiology and Data Science, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy.
Caterina DaidoneAnalytical Epidemiology and Health Impact Unit, Department of Epidemiology and Data Science, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy.
Kaire InnosDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, National Institute for Health Development, Tallinn, Estonia.
Rafael Marcos-GrageraConsortium for Biomedical Research in Epidemiology and Public Health (CIBERESP), Madrid, Spain.
Katrijn VanschoenbeekBelgium Cancer Registry, Bruxelles, Belgium.
Miguel Rodriguez BarrancoConsortium for Biomedical Research in Epidemiology and Public Health (CIBERESP), Madrid, Spain.
Ester Oliva PochDescriptive Epidemiology, Genetics and Cancer Prevention Group, Biomedical Research Institute (IDIBGI), Girona, Spain.
Roberto LilliniAnalytical Epidemiology and Health Impact Unit, Department of Epidemiology and Data Science, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy.
Lung Cancer HR Study Working Group
Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori · ITAndalusian School of Public Health · ESGovernment of Catalonia · ESInstitut d'Investigació Biomèdica de Girona · ESNational Institute for Health Development · EE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: To investigate differences in lung cancer (LC) management and survival using data from European population cancer registries. Methods: We analysed 4,602 lung cancer cases diagnosed in 2010-2013, followed-up to 2019 in five countries. Multivariable logistic regression was used to calculate the Odds Ratio (OR) of surgery for stages I-II LC or chemo- or radiotherapy for stages III-IV LC. Relative survival (RS) was estimated by the actuarial method; Relative Excess Risk of death (RER), with 95% CI, was calculated by generalized linear models. Results: Diagnostic work-up was extensive for 65.9% patients (range 57%, Estonia, Portugal - 85% (Belgium). Sixty-six percent of stages I-II patients underwent surgery; compared to non-operated, their adjusted OR decreased with age and was associated with main bronchus cancer (OR vs. lobes 0.25, CI, 0.08-0.82), stage II (OR vs. stage I: 0.42, CI, 0.29-0.60), comorbidity (OR vs. absent: 0.55, CI, 0.33-0.93), country (ORs: Estonia 1.82, CI, 1.28-2.60; Belgium 0.62, CI, 0.42-0.91; Portugal 0.69, CI, 0.52-0.93).Almost half of stages III-IV patients received chemo- or radiotherapy only; the adjusted OR vs. non receiving decreased with age and was associated with unspecified cancer topography or morphology. The adjusted five-year RER increased with age and stage and was lower for women (0.78, CI, 0.72-0.86), above the reference for main bronchus cancer (1.37, CI, 1.21-1.54) and unspecified morphology (1.17, CI, 1.05-1.30). Surgery carried the lowest mortality (RS 56.9; RER 0.13, CI, 0.11-0.15) with RER above the mean in Estonia (1.20, CI, 1.10-1.30), below it in Portugal (0.88, CI, 0.82-0.93) and Switzerland (0.91, CI, 0.84-0.99). Comorbidity (1.21, CI, 1.09-1.35) and not smoking (0.68, CI, 0.57-0.81) were associated with RER. Conclusions: The survival benefit of early diagnosis, allowing curative surgery, was evident at the population level. Screening for subjects at risk and adhesion to standard care should be incremented across the EU by funding better equipment and training health personnel.

Indexed as

comorbiditylung cancerpopulation registriessmokingsurvival

Identifiers

PMID38455923
PMCPMC10910949
OpenAlexW4323045757

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.