Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38455872›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in nutrition2023

Breast milk preservation: thermal and non-thermal processes and their effect on microorganism inactivation and the content of bioactive and nutritional compounds.

Alejandro Núñez-Delgado, Victoria Margarita Mizrachi-Chávez, Jorge Welti-Chanes, Samantha Thania Macher-Quintana, Cristina Chuck-Hernández

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in nutrition, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Rapid Detection ofBiosensors · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Alejandro Núñez-DelgadoTecnologico, de Monterrey, School of Engineering and Sciences, Monterrey, Mexico.
Victoria Margarita Mizrachi-ChávezTecnologico, de Monterrey, School of Engineering and Sciences, Monterrey, Mexico.
Jorge Welti-ChanesTecnologico, de Monterrey, School of Engineering and Sciences, Monterrey, Mexico.
Samantha Thania Macher-QuintanaTecnologico, de Monterrey, School of Engineering and Sciences, Monterrey, Mexico.
Cristina Chuck-HernándezTecnologico de Monterrey, Institute for Obesity Research, Monterrey, Mexico.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Human Breast Milk (HBM) is widely acknowledged as the best nutritional source for neonates. Data indicates that, in 2019, 83.2% of infants in the United States received breast milk at birth, slightly reducing to 78.6% at 1 month. Despite these encouraging early figures, exclusive breastfeeding rates sharply declined, dropping to 24.9% by 6 months. This decline is particularly pronounced when direct breastfeeding is challenging, such as in Neonatal Intensive Care Units (NICU) and for working mothers. Given this, it is vital to explore alternative breast milk preservation methods. Technologies like Holder Pasteurization (HoP), High-Temperature Short-Time Pasteurization (HTST), High-Pressure Processing (HPP), UV radiation (UV), and Electric Pulses (PEF) have been introduced to conserve HBM. This review aims to enhance the understanding of preservation techniques for HBM, supporting the practice of extended exclusive breastfeeding. It explicitly addresses microbial concerns, focusing on critical pathogens like

Indexed as

bioactive compoundsexpressed breast milkextended breastfeedingmaternal milkmilk conservationneonatal nutritionnon-thermal treatments

Identifiers

PMID38455872
PMCPMC10919153

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.