ArticleCureus2024
Mechanical Hatching as a Therapeutic Intervention for Improving Implantation Rate in a 32-Year-Old Female With Recurrent Implantation Failures: A Case Report.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This case report explores the application of mechanical hatching as a successful intervention in the treatment of primary infertility for a couple with a consanguineous marriage history and recurrent implantation failure. A 32-year-old female patient and her 37-year-old spouse, after six years of unsuccessful attempts to conceive, underwent multiple intrauterine insemination (IUI) and in vitro fertilization (IVF) and embryo transfer (ET) cycles without success. Normal parameters were observed in semen analysis and hormone tests for the male and female partners, respectively. Despite a series of failed assisted reproductive technology (ART) procedures, the implementation of mechanical hatching using partial zona dissection (PZD) pipettes led to a positive pregnancy outcome. The case underscores the potential efficacy of individualized approaches, specifically mechanical hatching, in addressing challenges associated with implantation failure, offering hope to couples facing infertility issues.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.