ArticleCureus2024
Analysis of Cutaneous Adverse Drug Reactions (ADR) Reported at an ADR Monitoring Center of a Tertiary Care Teaching Institute in Central India.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background Cutaneous adverse drug reactions (ADRs) are among the most frequent ADRs. Knowledge of the pattern of cutaneous ADRs (CADRs) and causal drugs helps prevent and reduce the incidence of CADR, which in turn reduces the incidence of hospitalization and expenses for the patient. Objectives To analyze CADR according to demographic profile, morphological pattern, causative drugs, severity, and outcome in patients suffering from CADRs. Materials and methods Retrospective data analysis was conducted in the Adverse Drug Reaction Monitoring Centre (AMC) of the tertiary care teaching institute between February 2020 and September 2023 under the Pharmacovigilance Program of India (PvPI). All ADRs reported were analyzed based on the following parameters: total number of ADRs reported, number of CADRs, information related to demographic parameters, the clinical presentation of CADRs, and suspected medication. Causality assessment was done using the World Health Organisation-Uppsala Monitoring Centre (WHO-UMC) scale. Severity was assessed using a modified Hartwig and Seigel scale. Results A total of 125 CADRs were analyzed. Considering the gender-wise distribution, 65 females and 60 males suffered from CADR. The most common drug category responsible for CADRs was antimicrobials (63.2%), followed by topical agents (12.8%). Maculopapular rash (33.6%) was the most common presenting symptom, followed by itching (27.2%). Few patients suffered from serious CADRs such as Stevens-Johnson syndrome (SJS) and toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN). Conclusion A wide clinical spectrum of CADRs ranging from maculopapular rash to fixed-drug eruption to serious SJS was observed in our study. The most common causative agents for CADRs were antimicrobials, followed by topical agents and NSAIDs. For early diagnosis and management of CADRs, it is critical to have data on the potential cutaneous adverse effects of commonly used drugs, to educate the patients regarding common early symptoms of drug reactions (e.g., erythematous rash, edema, urticaria, mucosal erosions, itching, burning of skin, etc.), and to monitor the patient, especially during the start of therapy. To ease the burden of CADRs, a therapeutic plan of anticipating, avoiding, recognizing, and responding to ADRs should be implemented.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.