Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38455585›Full record

ArticleHeliyon2024

Multimodal risk prediction with physiological signals, medical images and clinical notes.

Yuanlong Wang, Changchang Yin, Ping Zhang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Multimodal Wearable Biosensing Meets Multidomain AI: A Pathway to Decentralized Healthcare.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Analyzing Information Disparities across Modalities in Mortality Prediction.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2025
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Observational
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Yuanlong WangDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210, USA.
Changchang YinDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210, USA.
Ping ZhangDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210, USA.

Funding

A Statistical Network Pharmacology Approach for Early Detection of Adverse Drug EventsR01GM141279 · NIGMS · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI ZHANG, PENGYUE, ZHANG, PING · 2021 to 2023
$937k
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM141279
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The broad adoption of electronic health record (EHR) systems brings us a tremendous amount of clinical data and thus provides opportunities to conduct data-based healthcare research to solve various clinical problems in the medical domain. Machine learning and deep learning methods are widely used in the medical informatics and healthcare domain due to their power to mine insights from raw data. When adapting deep learning models for EHR data, it is essential to consider its heterogeneous nature: EHR contains patient records from various sources including medical tests (e.g. blood test, microbiology test), medical imaging, diagnosis, medications, procedures, clinical notes, etc. Those modalities together provide a holistic view of patient health status and complement each other. Therefore, combining data from multiple modalities that are intrinsically different is challenging but intuitively promising in deep learning for EHR. To assess the expectations of multimodal data, we introduce a comprehensive fusion framework designed to integrate temporal variables, medical images, and clinical notes in EHR for enhanced performance in clinical risk prediction. Early, joint, and late fusion strategies are employed to combine data from various modalities effectively. We test the model with three predictive tasks: in-hospital mortality, long length of stay, and 30-day readmission. Experimental results show that multimodal models outperform uni-modal models in the tasks involved. Additionally, by training models with different input modality combinations, we calculate the Shapley value for each modality to quantify their contribution to multimodal performance. It is shown that temporal variables tend to be more helpful than CXR images and clinical notes in the three explored predictive tasks.

Indexed as

Data fusionElectronic health recordsMultimodal deep learningRisk prediction

Identifiers

PMID38455585
PMCPMC10918115

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.