Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38455488›Full record

ArticleAnnals of gastroenterological surgery2024

Identification of patients at high risk for recurrence in carcinoma of the ampulla of Vater: Analysis in 460 patients.

Masato Narita, Etsuro Hatano, Koji Kitamura, Ken Fukumitsu, Hirohisa Kitagawa, Yuhei Hamaguchi, Takefumi Yazawa, Hiroaki Terajima, Kazuhiko Kitaguchi, Toshihiko Hata and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of gastroenterological surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Endoscopic Papillectomy for Ampullary Tumors in Older Patients: Balancing Oncologic Benefit and Geriatric Risk.Digestive endoscopy : official journal of the Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 10 institutions in 1 country.

Masato NaritaDepartment of Surgery National Hospital Organization Kyoto Medical Center Kyoto Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7872-0724
Etsuro HatanoDepartment of Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine Kyoto University Kyoto Japan.
Koji KitamuraDepartment of Surgery Hyogo Prefectural Amagasaki General Medical Center Amagasaki Japan.
Ken FukumitsuDepartment of Surgery Kyoto Katsura Hospital Kyoto Japan.
Hirohisa KitagawaDepartment of Surgery Kurashiki Central Hospital Kurashiki Japan.
Yuhei HamaguchiDepartment of Surgery Japanese Red Cross Osaka Hospital Osaka Japan.
Takefumi YazawaDepartment of Surgery Shiga General Hospital Shiga Japan.
Hiroaki TerajimaDepartment of Surgery Kitano Hospital Osaka Japan.
Kazuhiko KitaguchiDepartment of Surgery Japanese Red Cross Otsu Hospital Otsu Japan.
Toshihiko HataDepartment of Surgery Kobe City Medical Center West Hospital Kobe Japan.
Kyoto University Hepato‐Biliary Pancreatic surgery Study Group (KUHBPS)
Hyogo Prefectural Amagasaki General Medical Center · JPKitano Hospital · JPKobe City Medical Center West Hospital · JPKurashiki Central Hospital · JPKyoto Katsura Hospital · JPKyoto Medical Center · JPKyoto University · JPOsaka Hospital · JPOtsu Red Cross Hospital · JPShiga Medical Center · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aim: Carcinoma of the ampulla of Vater (CAV) shows a favorable prognosis compared to that with the other periampullary tumors, while some cases have a poor prognosis. The aims of the present study are to clarify the clinicopathological factors associated with poor recurrence-free survival (RFS) in patients with CAV after curative resection and to validate the usefulness of adjuvant chemotherapy (AC). Patients: The study design is a multicenter retrospective cohort study. Patients with CAV who underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy between January 2008 and December 2020 at 26 hospitals were analyzed. The 30 clinicopathological factors were evaluated. A propensity score matching (PSM) was used to compare between patients with and without AC. Results: Finally, 460 patients were analyzed. Median duration of follow-up was 47.2 months. Twenty-one prognostic factors associated with poor RFS were identified by univariate analysis. In multivariate analysis, aged ≥71, tumor diameter ≥12 mm, pT2 or higher stage (pT≥2), portal vein invasion (PV+), venous invasion(V+), and node positive disease (pN+) were independent prognostic factors for poor RFS. Out of 80 patients who received AC, 63 patients were assigned to analysis for PSM. The results showed no beneficial effect of AC on RFS. The preoperative factors potentially predicting pT≥2, V+, and/or N+ were at least one of following; (1) CA19-9 > 37 IU/mL, (2) ulcerative or mixed type appearance, (3) except for well-differentiated tumor, or (4) except for intestinal subtype of histology. Conclusions: Aged ≥71, tumor diameter ≥12 mm, pT≥2, PV+, V+, and pN+ were independent prognostic factors for poor RFS in patients with CAV. An additional therapeutic strategy may be desirable in CAV patients at high risk for recurrence.

Indexed as

adjuvant chemotherapyampullary cancerneoadjuvant chemotherapyoverall survivalprognosis

Identifiers

PMID38455488
PMCPMC10914706
OpenAlexW4390270373

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.