Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38455348›Full record

ArticleGland surgery2024

Machine learning models and nomogram based on clinical, laboratory profiles and skeletal muscle index to predict pancreatic fistula after pancreatoduodenectomy.

Yile Dai, Wenqian Huang, Liming Xu, Qiyu Zhang, Xiaming Huang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Gland surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Yile DaiThe First School of Clinical Medicine, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China.
Wenqian HuangDepartment of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China.
Liming XuDepartment of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Wenzhou Central Hospital, Wenzhou, China.
Qiyu ZhangDepartment of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China.
Xiaming HuangDepartment of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) is a perilous complication that may arise subsequent to pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD). In recent times, there has been an escalating interest in employing machine learning (ML) techniques to aid in treatment decision-making. The purpose of this research is to assess the effectiveness of ML in comparison to conventional models, while also conducting an initial evaluation of the predictive capability of skeletal muscle index (SMI) concerning POPF. Methods: This retrospective observational study was carried out at The First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University from January 2012 to January 2021, encompassing data from 269 patients who underwent PD. After identifying independent factors associated with the condition, a logistic regression model was employed to construct a nomogram, alongside the establishment of five ML models. To assess their effectiveness, the best-performing ML model and nomogram were evaluated on a separate test group comprising 77 additional patients. The evaluation involved comparing the area under the curve (AUC) and Brier score. Results: Among the 269 patients studied, the incidence of POPF was found to be 56.9%, with 106 patients (69.3%) experiencing clinically-relevant POPF. We identified six independent factors associated with POPF, including body mass index (BMI), SMI, pancreatic duct dilatation, tumor size, triglyceride levels, and the ratio of aspartate aminotransferase to alanine aminotransferase (AST/ALT) on the first postoperative day. When evaluated on the test set, the Gaussian Naive Bayes (GNB) model, which was the best-performing ML model, achieved an AUC of 0.824 and a Brier score of 0.175. The corresponding performance indicators for the nomogram were 0.844 for AUC and 0.165 for the Brier score. Conclusions: This study found that there is minimal difference between ML and the nomogram based on logistic regression in predicting POPF. Additionally, SMI shows promise as a potential and practical tool for assessing the risk of POPF.

Indexed as

Machine learning (ML)nomogrampancreaticoduodenectomy (PD)postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF)skeletal muscle index (SMI)

Identifiers

PMID38455348
PMCPMC10915431

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.