ArticleFrontiers in epidemiology2022
Reliability and validity of the
Article in Frontiers in epidemiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Associations of Overall Diet Quality and Individual Dietary Behaviours with Anthropometric Outcomes Among Chilean University Students.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Understanding eating behaviors in obesity: a DEBQ-based analysis of clinical and demographic factors.Journal of eating disorders · 2026Article
- The Mediating Effect of Eating Behaviors on Interoception, Self-Regulation and Weight Status Among College Students.Nutrients · 2024Article
- Article
- A Pilot Multisensory Approach for Emotional Eating: Pivoting from Virtual Reality to a 2-D Telemedicine Intervention during the COVID-19 Pandemic.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Article
- Psychometric properties of the online Satisfaction with Life Scale in university students from a low-income region.Psicologia, reflexao e critica : revista semestral do Departamento de Psicologia da UFRGS · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To test the reliability and validity of the Methods: We applied the questionnaire to a sample of 195 and 117 university students from a low-income region (Gini index of 0.56) to study validity and reliability, respectively. The DEBQ consists of 33 items on eating behavior in three dimensions/factors: emotional eating, restrained eating and external eating. The questionnaire was administered twice at 2-week intervals. We tested the reliability Results: For reliability, we identified an acceptable Spearman correlation coefficient (rho > 0.30 and Conclusion: The online format of the DEBQ has acceptable reliability and validity for measuring eating behavior in university students from low-income regions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.