Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38455254›Full record

ArticleEJVES vascular forum2024

Validity of Ultrasound for the Diagnosis of Arterial Thoracic Outlet Syndrome.

Emilia Stegemann, Jana Larbig, Berthold Stegemann, Irene Portig, Hans Prescher, Thomas Bürger

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in EJVES vascular forum, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Emilia StegemannPhilipps Universität Marburg, Marburg, Germany.
Jana LarbigKlinik für Allgemeine Innere Medizin, Diabetologie und Angiologie, AGAPLESION DIAKONIE KLINIKEN KASSEL, Kassel, Germany.
Berthold StegemannZentrum für Klinische Forschung Kassel, Kassel, Germany.
Irene PortigPhilipps Universität Marburg, Marburg, Germany.
Hans PrescherKlinik für Gefäß- und Endovaskuläre Chirurgie, AGAPLESION DIAKONIE KLINIKEN KASSEL, Kassel, Germany.
Thomas BürgerKlinik für Gefäß- und Endovaskuläre Chirurgie, AGAPLESION DIAKONIE KLINIKEN KASSEL, Kassel, Germany.
Agaplesion Frankfurter Diakonie Kliniken · DEPhilipps University of Marburg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: Thoracic outlet syndrome (TOS) is a rare disorder mostly seen in younger individuals. Although patient wellbeing is relevantly impaired, it often takes a long time before the diagnosis is made. Digital subtraction angiography (DSA) is routinely used despite its radiation exposure, which is a major concern in this young patient population. Moreover, DSA offers limited opportunities for functional assessment. By contrast, ultrasonography is widely accessible without causing radiation exposure and allows for flexible functional assessment. The main goal of the study was to investigate whether ultrasound (US) was a viable alternative to DSA in diagnosing arterial TOS (aTOS). Methods: Patients, referred to a tertiary centre for evaluation of suspected TOS, were recruited into the study. DSA was routinely performed with the patient's arms both in the raised (abducted) and neutral (adducted) position. Two vascular surgeons and two radiologists assessed the resulting images for the presence of aTOS. Additionally, two examiners performed US according to a standardised protocol. The reference for presence of aTOS was the DSA based interdisciplinary vascular conference consensus. Inter-rater agreement and latent class analysis (LCA) were performed between assessors and diagnostic methods. Results: Fifty one consecutive patients (two thirds female) aged 39.3 ± 13.0 years were included within 11 months. US agreement was excellent at 0.94 (0.841-0.980), DSA agreement for vascular surgeons was good at 0.779 (0.479-1.000), whereas it was moderate at 0.546 (0.046-1.000) for radiologists. Results suggest that DSA is untenable as the gold standard for aTOS diagnosis. In LCA, US was shown to be a reliable diagnostic tool for the detection of aTOS. Conclusion: US examination is a valid test for the detection of haemodynamically relevant compression of arteries in the diagnostic work up of aTOS using a standardised protocol. The role of DSA as the gold standard should be reviewed and needs to be reconsidered.

Indexed as

Digital subtraction angiographySonographyThoracic outlet syndrome

Identifiers

PMID38455254
PMCPMC10917999
OpenAlexW4391824757

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.