Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38455208›Full record

ArticleFood science & nutrition2024

Evaluating

Neslihan Dikbaş, Yusuf Can Orman, Şeyma Alım, Sevda Uçar, Ahmet Tülek

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Food science & nutrition, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Microorganisms · 2026
    Review
  4. Investigation of probiotic, anticancer and antimicrobial activity of Enterococcus bacteria isolated from the gut microbiota of marine snails.International microbiology : the official journal of the Spanish Society for Microbiology · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Investigation of Probiotic Properties ofFood science & nutrition · 2025
    Article
  8. Draft genome sequencing ofMicrobiology resource announcements · 2025
    Article
  9. EvaluatingFood science & nutrition · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Neslihan DikbaşDepartment of Agricultural Biotechnology, Agricultural Faculty Ataturk University Erzurum Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9096-2761
Yusuf Can OrmanDepartment of Agricultural Biotechnology, Agricultural Faculty Ataturk University Erzurum Turkey.
Şeyma AlımDepartment of Agricultural Biotechnology, Agricultural Faculty Ataturk University Erzurum Turkey.
Sevda UçarDepartment of Herbal Production and Technologies, Faculty of Agricultural Sciences and Technology Sivas Science and Technology University Sivas Turkey.
Ahmet TülekDepartment of Bioengineering and Sciences Iğdır University Iğdır Turkey.
Atatürk University · TRIğdır Üniversitesi · TRSivas State Hospital · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this study, various functional and probiotic attributes of the

Indexed as

Enterococcus faeciumlactic acid bacteriaphytaseprobiotic properties

Identifiers

PMID38455208
PMCPMC10916548
OpenAlexW4389148526

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.