Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38454914›Full record

ArticleNMC case report journal2024

Retained Intracerebral Depth Electrode after Stereotactic Electroencephalography Monitoring: A Case Report.

Kota Kagawa, Koji Iida, Akira Hashizume, Go Seyama, Akitake Okamura, Rofat Askoro, Nobutaka Horie

Open access · diamondAbstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in NMC case report journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 42% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Kota KagawaDepartment of Neurosurgery, Hiroshima University Hospital, Hiroshima, Hiroshima, Japan.
Koji IidaEpilepsy Center, Hiroshima University Hospital, Hiroshima, Hiroshima, Japan.
Akira HashizumeDepartment of Neurosurgery, Hiroshima University Hospital, Hiroshima, Hiroshima, Japan.
Go SeyamaDepartment of Neurosurgery, Hiroshima University Hospital, Hiroshima, Hiroshima, Japan.
Akitake OkamuraDepartment of Neurosurgery, Hiroshima University Hospital, Hiroshima, Hiroshima, Japan.
Rofat AskoroEpilepsy Center, Hiroshima University Hospital, Hiroshima, Hiroshima, Japan.
Nobutaka HorieDepartment of Neurosurgery, Graduate School of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Hiroshima, Japan.
Hiroshima University Hospital · JPHiroshima University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Stereotactic electroencephalography (SEEG) is an increasingly popular surgical modality for localizing the epileptogenic zone. Robot-guided stereotactic electrode placement has been covered in Japan by National Health Insurance since 2020. However, several surgical devices, such as the anchor bolt (a thin, hollow, metal shaft that serves as a guide screw or fixing for each electrode), have not been approved. A 14-year-old female who underwent SEEG for intractable epilepsy and required additional surgery to remove a retained depth electrode from the skull after the SEEG monitoring was finished. She had uncontrolled focal seizures consisting of nausea and laryngeal constriction at the onset. After a comprehensive presurgical evaluation, robot-guided stereotactic electrode implantation was performed to evaluate her seizures by SEEG. Nine depth electrodes were implanted through the twist drill hole. The electrodes were sutured to her skin for fixation without anchor bolts. When we attempted to remove the electrodes after 8 days of SEEG monitoring, one of the electrodes was retained. The retained electrode was removed through an additional skin incision and a small craniectomy under general anesthesia. We confirmed narrowing of the twist drill hole pathway in the internal table of the skull due to osteogenesis, which locked the electrode. This complication might be avoided if an anchor bolt had been used. This case report prompts the approval of the anchor bolts to avoid difficulty in electrode removal. Moreover, approval of a depth electrode with a thinner diameter and more consistent hardness is needed.

Indexed as

anchor boltelectrode removalintracerebral depth electrodeintractable epilepsystereotactic electroencephalography

Identifiers

PMID38454914
PMCPMC10918211
OpenAlexW4391771164

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.