Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38454530›Full record

ArticleAnimal microbiome2024

Interkingdom interactions shape the fungal microbiome of mosquitoes.

Shivanand Hegde, Kamil Khanipov, Emily A Hornett, Pornjarim Nilyanimit, Maria Pimenova, Miguel A Saldaña, Charissa de Bekker, George Golovko, Grant L Hughes

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Animal microbiome, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Fungal microbiota diversity inWellcome open research · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Horizons of the Future: Preparedness and Response.Current topics in microbiology and immunology · 2026
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Shivanand HegdeDepartments of Vector Biology and Tropical Disease Biology, Centre for Neglected Tropical Disease, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, UK. s.m.hegde@keele.ac.uk.
Kamil KhanipovDepartment of Pharmacology and Toxicology, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX, USA.
Emily A HornettDepartments of Vector Biology and Tropical Disease Biology, Centre for Neglected Tropical Disease, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, UK.
Pornjarim NilyanimitCenter of Excellence in Clinical Virology, Faculty of Medicine , Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Maria PimenovaDepartment of Pharmacology and Toxicology, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX, USA.
Miguel A SaldañaDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX, USA.
Charissa de BekkerMicrobiology, Department of Biology, Utrecht University, 3584 CH, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
George GolovkoDepartment of Pharmacology and Toxicology, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX, USA.
Grant L HughesDepartments of Vector Biology and Tropical Disease Biology, Centre for Neglected Tropical Disease, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, UK. grant.hughes@lstmed.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7567-7185

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/T001240/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe mosquito microbiome is an important modulator of vector competence and vectoral capacity. Unlike the extensively studied bacterial microbiome, fungal communities in the mosquito microbiome (the mycobiome) remain largely unexplored. To work towards getting an improved understanding of the fungi associated with mosquitoes, we sequenced the mycobiome of three field-collected and laboratory-reared mosquito species (Aedes albopictus, Aedes aegypti, and Culex quinquefasciatus).

resultsOur analysis showed both environment and host species were contributing to the diversity of the fungal microbiome of mosquitoes. When comparing species, Ae. albopictus possessed a higher number of diverse fungal taxa than Cx. quinquefasciatus, while strikingly less than 1% of reads from Ae. aegypti samples were fungal. Fungal reads from Ae. aegypti were < 1% even after inhibiting host amplification using a PNA blocker, indicating that this species lacked a significant fungal microbiome that was amplified using this sequencing approach. Using a mono-association mosquito infection model, we confirmed that mosquito-derived fungal isolates colonize Aedes mosquitoes and support growth and development at comparable rates to their bacterial counterparts. Strikingly, native bacterial taxa isolated from mosquitoes impeded the colonization of symbiotic fungi in Ae. aegypti suggesting interkingdom interactions shape fungal microbiome communities.

conclusionCollectively, this study adds to our understanding of the fungal microbiome of different mosquito species, that these fungal microbes support growth and development, and highlights that microbial interactions underpin fungal colonization of these medically relevent species.

Indexed as

Axenic mosquitoesCandidaEnvironmental factorsFungi-bacteria interactionsGut fungiInter-kingdom interactionsMicrobiome manipulationsMycobiomeSachharomycesSterile rearing

Identifiers

PMID38454530
PMCPMC10921588

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.