ArticleBMC oral health2024
Clinical outcomes of 3-5 years follow-up of immediate implant placement in posterior teeth: a prospective study.
Article in BMC oral health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- Early versus conventional loading for fully guided immediate implant placement in molar sites: a randomized controlled clinical study.International journal of implant dentistry · 2025Trial
- Wide-thread implant macrogeometry and immediate implant placement: A systematic review of primary stability, marginal bone loss, and survival outcomes.Journal of clinical and experimental dentistry · 2026Review
- The Influence of the Topical Combined Application of Dexamethasone, Ascorbic Acid, and β-Sodium Glycerophosphate on Implant Osseointegration: A Split-Mouth Randomized Clinical Trial.International journal of dentistry · 2026Article
- Comparative evaluation of immediate versus delayed loading in dental implants.Bioinformation · 2026Article
- Immediate Loading of Implants Placed Immediately in Fresh Sockets: A 10-Year Single-Arm Prospective Case Series Follow-Up.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- A prospective clinical study of immediate implant placement in the maxillary esthetic zone.Journal of periodontal & implant science · 2025Article
- Evaluating the Success of Immediate Implants in the Esthetic Zone: A Narrative Review with Case Illustration.Dentistry journal · 2025Review
- Thread design optimization of a dental implant using explicit dynamics finite element analysis.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Optimizing Implant Placement Timing and Loading Protocols for Successful Functional and Esthetic Outcomes: A Narrative Literature Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Immediate Implant Therapy with Full-Digital Workflow to Replace a Central Incisor.Dentistry journal · 2025Article
- Comparative Evaluation of Piezosurgery Versus Conventional Surgical Implant Placement and Impact on Implant Stability, Bone Density, and Patient Comfort: A Randomized Clinical Study.International journal of dentistry · 2025Article
- Immediate versus delayed loading of implants in posterior mandible: A CBCT-based one-year comparative study.Bioinformation · 2025Article
- Accuracy of robotic-assisted surgery for immediate implant placement in posterior teeth: a retrospective case series.BMC oral health · 2024Article
- Attitudes of Oral Surgeons and Periodontists towards Immediate Dental Implant Placement.Journal of oral & maxillofacial researchArticle
- Immediate implant placement in a chronic periradicular resorptive lesion: A case report of timely restoration and successful outcomes.Journal of Indian Society of PeriodontologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundImmediate implant placement in posterior teeth has become popular in recent years. However, only a few studies focused on evaluating the long-term success of immediate implant placement. PURPOSE: To analyze the clinical outcomes of immediate implant placement in the posterior region with conventional loading with 3-5 years follow-up following the International Congress of Oral Implantologists (ICOI) Pisa Consensus Conference.
methodThe study was done in 25 bone-level implants (Straumann® SLActive® bone level tapered implant, Straumann®, Basel, Switzerland) in 19 patients who underwent immediate implant placement in a posterior tooth with conventional loading with 3-5 years follow-up. The overall success and survival of these placements were evaluated following the International Congress of Oral Implantologists (ICOI) Pisa Consensus Conference using chart records, clinical examination, radiographic evaluation, and outcomes measurement. Patient satisfaction was evaluated by using a numeric rating scale. The biological and technical status, modified Pink Esthetic Score (mPES), complications, and marginal bone change were also evaluated. The analysis was done using SPSS version 21 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). The data were analyzed using a paired samples t-test.
resultsIt was found that 24 out of the 25 (96%) dental implants survived for an average of 57 ± 8.07 months. All of the 24 surviving dental implants were considered an operational success. The average mPES was 9.75 ± 0.44. The major prosthetic complications seen were: (1) proximal contact loss (41.67%), (2) loosening of the screw (8.33%), and (3) cement debonding (4.17%).
conclusionsImmediate implant placement in a posterior tooth with conventional loading yields a predictable result with some complications. The most prominent complications were proximal contact loss, followed by loosening of the screw and cement debonding. The implant survival rate was 96% at a mean time follow-up of 4 years and 9 months.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.