Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38454349›Full record

ArticleBMC cancer2024

Fully semantic segmentation for rectal cancer based on post-nCRT MRl modality and deep learning framework.

Shaojun Xia, Qingyang Li, Hai-Tao Zhu, Xiao-Yan Zhang, Yan-Jie Shi, Ding Yang, Jiaqi Wu, Zhen Guan, Qiaoyuan Lu, Xiao-Ting Li and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC cancer, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. The Role of Harmonization: A Systematic Analysis of Various Task-based Scenarios.Proceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Shaojun XiaInstitute of Medical Technology, Peking University Health Science Center, Haidian District, No. 38 Xueyuan Road, Beijing, 100191, China.
Qingyang LiKey Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/ Beijing), Department of Radiology, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Hai Dian District, No. 52 Fu Cheng Road, Beijing, 100142, China.
Hai-Tao ZhuKey Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/ Beijing), Department of Radiology, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Hai Dian District, No. 52 Fu Cheng Road, Beijing, 100142, China.
Xiao-Yan ZhangKey Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/ Beijing), Department of Radiology, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Hai Dian District, No. 52 Fu Cheng Road, Beijing, 100142, China.
Yan-Jie ShiKey Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/ Beijing), Department of Radiology, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Hai Dian District, No. 52 Fu Cheng Road, Beijing, 100142, China.
Ding YangKey Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/ Beijing), Department of Radiology, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Hai Dian District, No. 52 Fu Cheng Road, Beijing, 100142, China.
Jiaqi WuKey Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/ Beijing), Department of Radiology, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Hai Dian District, No. 52 Fu Cheng Road, Beijing, 100142, China.
Zhen GuanKey Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/ Beijing), Department of Radiology, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Hai Dian District, No. 52 Fu Cheng Road, Beijing, 100142, China.
Qiaoyuan LuKey Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/ Beijing), Department of Radiology, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Hai Dian District, No. 52 Fu Cheng Road, Beijing, 100142, China.
Xiao-Ting LiKey Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/ Beijing), Department of Radiology, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Hai Dian District, No. 52 Fu Cheng Road, Beijing, 100142, China.
Ying-Shi SunInstitute of Medical Technology, Peking University Health Science Center, Haidian District, No. 38 Xueyuan Road, Beijing, 100191, China. sys27@163.com.
Peking University Cancer Hospital · CNPeking University · CN

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 91959116
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeRectal tumor segmentation on post neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has great significance for tumor measurement, radiomics analysis, treatment planning, and operative strategy. In this study, we developed and evaluated segmentation potential exclusively on post-chemoradiation T2-weighted MRI using convolutional neural networks, with the aim of reducing the detection workload for radiologists and clinicians.

methodsA total of 372 consecutive patients with LARC were retrospectively enrolled from October 2015 to December 2017. The standard-of-care neoadjuvant process included 22-fraction intensity-modulated radiation therapy and oral capecitabine. Further, 243 patients (3061 slices) were grouped into training and validation datasets with a random 80:20 split, and 41 patients (408 slices) were used as the test dataset. A symmetric eight-layer deep network was developed using the nnU-Net Framework, which outputs the segmentation result with the same size. The trained deep learning (DL) network was examined using fivefold cross-validation and tumor lesions with different TRGs.

resultsAt the stage of testing, the Dice similarity coefficient (DSC), 95% Hausdorff distance (HD95), and mean surface distance (MSD) were applied to quantitatively evaluate the performance of generalization. Considering the test dataset (41 patients, 408 slices), the average DSC, HD95, and MSD were 0.700 (95% CI: 0.680-0.720), 17.73 mm (95% CI: 16.08-19.39), and 3.11 mm (95% CI: 2.67-3.56), respectively. Eighty-two percent of the MSD values were less than 5 mm, and fifty-five percent were less than 2 mm (median 1.62 mm, minimum 0.07 mm).

conclusionsThe experimental results indicated that the constructed pipeline could achieve relatively high accuracy. Future work will focus on assessing the performances with multicentre external validation.

Indexed as

Deep LearningRectal NeoplasmsHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMagnetic Resonance ImagingNeoadjuvant TherapyRetrospective StudiesSemanticsDeep learningDifferent tumor regression gradesPost-nCRT MRIRectal cancerSemantic segmentation

Identifiers

PMID38454349
PMCPMC10919051
OpenAlexW4392554776

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.