ArticleBMC cancer2024
Fully semantic segmentation for rectal cancer based on post-nCRT MRl modality and deep learning framework.
Article in BMC cancer, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Review
- Automated deep learning model for predicting pathological complete response in rectal cancer: A tool to organ-preserving strategies.International journal of colorectal disease · 2026Article
- Article
- Deep Learning for Automated Tumor Segmentation of Rectal Cancer on T2-Weighted Magnetic Resonance Images.Yonsei medical journal · 2026Article
- CRLM-GAN: a feature-constrained GAN-based deep learning framework for multi-parametric MRI-based segmentation of colorectal liver metastases before and after chemotherapy.Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society · 2025Article
- Evaluation of unified harmonization of CT images across multiple tasks: A step towards AI generalizability.Medical physics · 2025Article
- Deep learning automatic segmentation and radiomics model for diagnosing pancreatic solid neoplasms in MRI.BMC cancer · 2025Article
- Comparison of deep learning-based segmentation and registration using pre-treatment contours for online rectal delineation in magnetic resonance-guided radiotherapy.Physics and imaging in radiation oncology · 2025Article
- Rectal-RadioSAM: Large model-assisted multi-parametric magnetic resonance imaging pipeline for predicting response to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in rectal cancer without human intervention.Physics and imaging in radiation oncology · 2025Article
- The Role of Harmonization: A Systematic Analysis of Various Task-based Scenarios.Proceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering · 2025Article
- Efficient strategy for magnetic resonance image-guided adaptive radiotherapy of rectal cancer using a library of reference plans.Physics and imaging in radiation oncology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
purposeRectal tumor segmentation on post neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has great significance for tumor measurement, radiomics analysis, treatment planning, and operative strategy. In this study, we developed and evaluated segmentation potential exclusively on post-chemoradiation T2-weighted MRI using convolutional neural networks, with the aim of reducing the detection workload for radiologists and clinicians.
methodsA total of 372 consecutive patients with LARC were retrospectively enrolled from October 2015 to December 2017. The standard-of-care neoadjuvant process included 22-fraction intensity-modulated radiation therapy and oral capecitabine. Further, 243 patients (3061 slices) were grouped into training and validation datasets with a random 80:20 split, and 41 patients (408 slices) were used as the test dataset. A symmetric eight-layer deep network was developed using the nnU-Net Framework, which outputs the segmentation result with the same size. The trained deep learning (DL) network was examined using fivefold cross-validation and tumor lesions with different TRGs.
resultsAt the stage of testing, the Dice similarity coefficient (DSC), 95% Hausdorff distance (HD95), and mean surface distance (MSD) were applied to quantitatively evaluate the performance of generalization. Considering the test dataset (41 patients, 408 slices), the average DSC, HD95, and MSD were 0.700 (95% CI: 0.680-0.720), 17.73 mm (95% CI: 16.08-19.39), and 3.11 mm (95% CI: 2.67-3.56), respectively. Eighty-two percent of the MSD values were less than 5 mm, and fifty-five percent were less than 2 mm (median 1.62 mm, minimum 0.07 mm).
conclusionsThe experimental results indicated that the constructed pipeline could achieve relatively high accuracy. Future work will focus on assessing the performances with multicentre external validation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.