Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38454212›Full record

ArticleActa orthopaedica et traumatologica turcica2023

The initial response of a local hospital in the earthquake zone during the February 6, 2023 Kahramanmaraş earthquakes: Injuries and challenges.

Muhammed Köroğlu, Mustafa Karakaplan, Emre Ergen, Kadir Ertem, İdris Çoban, Harun Köse, Neslihan Yücel, Murat Bıçakçıoğlu, Ayşe Belin Özer, Oya Olcay Özdeş and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Acta orthopaedica et traumatologica turcica, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
6.0field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Muhammed KöroğluDepartment of Orthopedics and Traumatology, İnönü University, Malatya, Turkey.
Mustafa KarakaplanDepartment of Orthopedics and Traumatology, İnönü University, Malatya, Turkey.
Emre ErgenDepartment of Orthopedics and Traumatology, İnönü University, Malatya, Turkey.
Kadir ErtemDepartment of Orthopedics and Traumatology, İnönü University, Malatya, Turkey.
İdris ÇobanDepartment of Orthopedics and Traumatology, İnönü University, Malatya, Turkey.
Harun KöseDepartment of Orthopedics and Traumatology, İnönü University, Malatya, Turkey.
Neslihan YücelDepartment of Emergency Medicine, İnönü University, Malatya, Turkey.
Murat BıçakçıoğluDepartment of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, İnönü University, Malatya, Turkey.
Ayşe Belin ÖzerDepartment of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, İnönü University, Malatya, Turkey.
Oya Olcay ÖzdeşDepartment of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, İnönü University, Malatya, Turkey.
Hüseyin Utku ÖzdeşDepartment of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Yeşilyurt Hasan Çalık State Hospital, Malatya, Turkey.
Okan AslantürkDepartment of Orthopedics and Traumatology, İnönü University, Malatya, Turkey.
Inonu University · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThis study aimed to describe the type and number of traumatic injuries seen after devastating earthquakes and to evaluate the difficulties experienced in the treatment process in a primary affected center.

methodsOut of the 2176 patients who were treated in the emergency department, 372 (199 male and 173 female) patients with complete data were included in this single-center retrospective study. In addition to the demographic characteristics of the patients, orthopedic injuries, other organ system injuries, type of injury, treatments, mechanisms of injury, and time of presentation to the emergency department were recorded.

resultsThe most common age group for injury was 20-30 years old, consisting of 73 patients (19.62%), and the second most common age group was between 40 and 50, with 72 patients (19.35%). Injury after being trapped under rubble was seen in 152 (40.86%) patients, while non-debris causes were more common in 220 patients (59.14%). The most common site of injury was in the lower extremities, with 111 patients (29.84%), while multiple injuries were seen in 109 patients (29.3%). Lower extremity fractures were mostly seen in long bones such as the femur (12.28%) and tibia (11.4%). Upper extremity fractures, especially those due to falls, were most frequently in the distal radius (8.77%). After triage, 117 patients (31.45%) were hospitalized, whereas the majority of patients (58.33%) were discharged from the emergency department.

conclusionThis study has shown us that injuries following major earthquakes are of a wide spectrum and occur in large numbers and in a very short time. Even in a well-equipped hospital that is not affected by an earthquake, there are many barriers to appropriate management. The first 24 hours after an earthquake are critical. This period should be kept in mind while organizing and taking necessary precautions, and early responses to earthquakes should be meticulously planned.

Indexed as

EarthquakesFractures, BoneMultiple TraumaAdultFemaleHospitalsHumansMaleRetrospective StudiesYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID38454212
PMCPMC10837596
OpenAlexW4391291532

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.