ArticleScientific reports2024
Treatment outcome and survival status among adult patients treated for lupus nephritis in selected tertiary hospitals of Ethiopia.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Free mycophenolic acid exposure for therapeutic drug monitoring in paediatric lupus nephritis: associations with treatment response and haematologic toxicity.Lupus science & medicine · 2026Article
- Clinical outcomes and prognostic factors in lupus nephritis: impact of remission on renal and overall survival in a single-center study.BMC nephrology · 2026Article
- Successful Cyclosporine Salvage Therapy in Refractory Lupus Nephritis: A Case Study From Ethiopia.Current therapeutic research, clinical and experimental · 2026Article
- Clinicopathological characteristics and long-term outcomes of adult patients with proliferative lupus nephritis.World journal of nephrology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Lupus nephritis (LN) is kidney involvement of systematic lupus erythematous that ranges from mild to severe and occurs in 60% of adult patients. Despite advances in therapy, LN morbidity and mortality remains high. There is a paucity of data regarding adult LN patient's treatment outcome, survival status, and associated factors in developing countries, particularly in Ethiopia. This study aimed to assess the treatment outcome, survival status, and associated factors of adult patients treated for LN in two selected tertiary hospitals [Tikur Anbessa Specialized Hospital (TASH) and St. Paul's Hospital Millennium Medical College (SPHMMC)] of Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. A hospital-based retrospective cross-sectional multicenter study was conducted from January 1, 2016 to January 1, 2021. Socio-demographic, clinical, and treatment-related data were collected from patient's medical records by using a structured abstraction checklist. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize the quantitative data as appropriate. The modified Aspreva Lupus Management Study (mALMS) criteria was applied to categorize LN treatment outcomes into complete, partial, and non-response. Multinomial logistic regression analysis was performed to identify predictors of LN treatment outcome. Patients' survival was estimated by using Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportion regression analysis. P value < 0.05 was considered to declare statistical significance. A total of 200 LN patients were included in the final analysis. Amongst these, the majority of them (91.5%) were females. The median age of the patients was 28 (15-60) years. The mean duration of treatment follow-up was 28 months. The commonly prescribed immunosuppressive drugs during both the induction (49.5%) and maintenance (60%) phases were a combination of mycophenolate mofetil with prednisolone. Complete, partial, and non-responses at the last follow-up visit accounted for 66.5%, 18.0%, and 15.5%, respectively. Patient survival at the last follow-up visit was more than 90% for patients with complete response to the induction therapy. Non-response at the last follow-up visit was significantly associated with severe disease activity index (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] = 6.25, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.49-26.10), presence of comorbidity (AOR = 0.21, 95% CI 0.05-0.92), baseline leucopenia (AOR = 14.2, 95% CI 1.04-201.3), partial response at the end of induction therapy (AOR = 32.63, 95% CI 1.4-736.0), and duration of induction therapy of greater than 6 months (AOR = 19.47, 95% CI 1.5-258.8). This study unveiled that lower numbers of LN patients were presented with non-response at the last follow-up visit and non-response to induction therapy was associated with lower patients' survival rates compared with complete or partial response.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.