Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38454127›Full record

ReviewNature medicine2024

Self-care interventions for women's health and well-being.

Manjulaa Narasimhan, James R Hargreaves, Carmen H Logie, Quarraisha Abdool-Karim, Mandip Aujla, Jonathan Hopkins, Jane Cover, Olive Sentumbwe-Mugisa, Allan Maleche, Kate Gilmore

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
19.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Reducing inequities in access to postpartum hemorrhage prevention: Reframing advance distribution of misoprostol as a test case for health system responsiveness and adaptation.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Advancements and future directions inAmerican journal of physiology. Cell physiology · 2024
    Article
  12. Addressing harmful gender norms in sexual health services.Bulletin of the World Health Organization · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 8 institutions in 7 countries.

Manjulaa NarasimhanDepartment of Sexual and Reproductive Health and Research, including the UNDP/UNFPA/UNICEF/WHO/World Bank Special Programme of Research, Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction (HRP), World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland. narasimhanm@who.int.ORCID 0000-0003-0598-6887
James R HargreavesCenter for Evaluation, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Carmen H LogieFactor-Inwentash Faculty of Social Work, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-8035-433X
Quarraisha Abdool-KarimCenter for the AIDS Programme of Research in South Africa (CAPRISA), Durban, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0002-0985-477X
Mandip AujlaDepartment of Sexual and Reproductive Health and Research, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
Jonathan HopkinsU-turn Homeless Ministries, Cape Town, South Africa.
Jane CoverSexual and Reproductive Health Program, PATH, Seattle, WA, USA.
Olive Sentumbwe-MugisaWorld Health Organization Country Office, Kampala, Uganda.
Allan MalecheKenya Legal & Ethical Issues Network on HIV and AIDS (KELIN), Nairobi, Kenya.
Kate GilmoreDepartment of International Development, London School of Economics and Political Science, London, UK.
World Health Organization · CHCentre for the AIDS Programme of Research in South Africa · ZALondon School of Economics and Political Science · GBLondon School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine · GBProgram for Appropriate Technology in Health · USThe Childhood Acute Illness and Nutrition Network · KEUniversity of Toronto · CAWorld Health Organization - Uganda · UG

Funding

World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The human right to health is universal and non-exclusionary, supporting health in full, and for all. Despite advances in health systems globally, 3.6 billion people lack access to essential health services. Women and girls are disadvantaged when it comes to benefiting from quality health services, owing to social norms, unequal power in relationships, lack of consideration beyond their reproductive roles and poverty. Self-care interventions, including medicines and diagnostics, which offer an additional option to facility-based care, can improve the autonomy and agency of women in managing their own health. However, tackling challenges such as stigma is essential to avoid scenarios in which self-care interventions provide more choice for those who already benefit from access to quality healthcare, and leave behind those with the greatest need. This Perspective explores the opportunities that self-care interventions offer to advance the health and well-being of women with an approach grounded in human rights, gender equality and equity.

Indexed as

Self CareWomen's HealthFemaleHumansPovertyWomen's Rights

Identifiers

PMID38454127
OpenAlexW4392562044

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.