ArticleScientific reports2024
Study of the intestinal microbiota composition and the effect of treatment with intensive chemotherapy in patients recovered from acute leukemia.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Distinct gut microbiota signatures in white leghorn and silky fowl are associated with divergent laying performance.Poultry science · 2026Article
- Genomic characteristics and drug resistance phenotype of Levyella massiliensis isolated from blood.BMC microbiology · 2026Article
- The impact of gut microbiota on leukemia and prospects for novel therapies.Infectious medicine · 2026Review
- The gut-bone marrow axis in acute leukemia: an evidence-graded review of microbiota-immune crosstalk and therapeutic implications.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026Review
- Therapeutic ecology of the fiber-microbiota-barrier axis in leukemia: resilience, immune recovery and pharmacomicrobiomics.Frontiers in microbiology · 2026Review
- Article
- Host-microbiome interactions in leukemia: mechanisms, treatment response, and clinical implications.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026Review
- How aging influences the gut-bone marrow axis and alters hematopoietic stem cell regulation.Heliyon · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
10 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
A dataset comprising metagenomes of outpatients (n = 28) with acute leukemia (AL) and healthy controls (n = 14) was analysed to investigate the associations between gut microbiota composition and metabolic activity and AL. According to the results obtained, no significant differences in the microbial diversity between AL outpatients and healthy controls were found. However, significant differences in the abundance of specific microbial clades of healthy controls and AL outpatients were found. We found some differences at taxa level. The relative abundance of Enterobacteriaceae, Prevotellaceae and Rikenellaceae was increased in AL outpatients, while Bacteirodaceae, Bifidobacteriaceae and Lachnospiraceae was decreased. Interestingly, the abundances of several taxa including Bacteroides and Faecalibacterium species showed variations based on recovery time from the last cycle of chemotherapy. Functional annotation of metagenome-assembled genomes (MAGs) revealed the presence of functional domains corresponding to therapeutic enzymes including L-asparaginase in a wide range of genera including Prevotella, Ruminococcus, Faecalibacterium, Alistipes, Akkermansia. Metabolic network modelling revealed potential symbiotic relationships between Veillonella parvula and Levyella massiliensis and several species found in the microbiota of AL outpatients. These results may contribute to develop strategies for the recovery of microbiota composition profiles in the treatment of patients with AL.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.