ArticleScientific reports2024
Impact of squatting on selected cardiovascular parameters among college students.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Acute Blood Pressure Changes Following Resistance Exercise in Adults with Hypertension.Journal of functional morphology and kinesiology · 2025Article
- Blood pressure changes during different methods of resistance training in normotensive and stage 1 hypertensive individuals: a repeated measures cross-sectional study.BMC sports science, medicine & rehabilitation · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Squatting is an active posture test used in assessing baroreflex sensitivity, and the array of patients a physiotherapist handles may benefit from this test to avoid the adverse effects of exercise. Therefore, this study is designed to evaluate the effect of squatting on heart rate and blood pressure among undergraduate students. 35 males (mean age = 22.94 ± 1.846) and 40 females (mean age = 22.28 ± 2.075) participated in this experimental study. Demographic data and baseline cardiovascular parameters (blood pressure and heart rate) were taken before exercise. The exercise protocol, the squatting stress test, was done for 2 min, after which post-exercise blood pressure and heart rate were taken at one minute each. A repeated measure ANOVA and independent t-test were used to analyse the difference at the 0.05 alpha level. It was found that there was a significant difference between pre-exercise in lying and squatting post-exercise blood pressure and heart rate in the first and second minutes (p < 0.01), pre-exercise in lying and standing post-exercise blood pressure and heart rate in the first and second minutes (p < 0.01), pre-exercise in standing and standing post-exercise blood pressure and heart rate in the first and second minutes (p < 0.01), and pre-exercise in standing and squatting post-exercise blood pressure and heart rate in the first and second minutes (p < 0.01). Also, there was a significant difference in pre-exercise heart rate between lying and standing (p < 0.05) and not between the first minute and second minute post-squatting or standing exercise systolic blood pressure (p = 0.588) or diastolic blood pressure (p = 0.22-1). In conclusion, squatting trials among undergraduates revealed some statistically significant changes, especially between the cardiopulmonary parameters obtained in a standing position compared to lying and those measured after one minute. Therefore, caution should be observed when administering exercises that require changes in posture.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.