Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38454088›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Exploring the effect of different typical plant community on human stress reduction: a field experiment.

Wenfei Yao, Qingzi Luo, Xiaofeng Zhang, Chen Zhuo, Longfei Mi

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical Study
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Forest Bathing (Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Wenfei YaoCollege of Architecture and Urban Planning, Qingdao University of Technology, Qingdao, Shandong, People's Republic of China. yaowenfei8345604@163.com.
Qingzi LuoCollege of Architecture and Urban Planning, Qingdao University of Technology, Qingdao, Shandong, People's Republic of China.
Xiaofeng ZhangCollege of Landscape Architecture, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, People's Republic of China.
Chen ZhuoCollege of Architecture and Urban Planning, Qingdao University of Technology, Qingdao, Shandong, People's Republic of China.
Longfei MiEngineering Research Center of Concrete Technology Under Marine Environment, Ministry of Education, Qingdao University of Technology, Qingdao, China. milongfei@qut.edu.cn.
Qingdao University of Technology · CNNanjing Forestry University · CN

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 32001367
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Research has demonstrated the positive effect of natural environment on human restoration and well-being. Time spent in nature can often alleviate both physiological and psychological stress. However, few studies have discussed the environmental health effects of the nature's components and characteristics. Sixty volunteers were recruited and one manufactured environment and five different natural environments were randomly assigned to them, including coniferous forests (pure coniferous forest-PC and mixed coniferous forest-MC), broad-leaved forests (pure broad-leaved forest-PB and mixed broad-leaved forest-MB), and mixed forest (mixed coniferous and broad-leaved forest-MCB). Each volunteer sat in a built or natural environment and looked around the environment for 15 min. Physiological (HR, HRV, BP, pulse rate and salivary cortisol) and psychological indicators (POMS and STAI) were used to evaluate the changes in their stress level. Results indicated a strong difference in HR, HRV, POMS and STAI between the built and natural environment, which showed that natural environment can lower the stress level. MC had the best effect on relieving physiological stress, whereas MCB is most successful in improving emotional state and reducing anxiety. Broad-leaved forest and mixed forest significantly affected the DBP and vigor level of the subjects, respectively. While coniferous forest did significantly increase the concentration of salivary cortisol in subjects. The study confirmed that compared to the built environment, the natural environment can relieve the human body's physical and psychological stress and negative emotions, while significantly increasing vitality. And different plant communities also have different effects on the physiological and psychological indicators of the subjects. These results will provide scientific basis for the construction and improvement of urban green space environment.

Indexed as

HydrocortisoneTracheophytaAnxietyChinaEmotionsForestsHumansRandom AllocationTreesHydrocortisoneNatural exposurePhysiological effectsPlant communityPsychological effectsStress reduction

Identifiers

PMID38454088
PMCPMC10920666
OpenAlexW4392558050

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.