Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38454021›Full record

ArticleNature genetics2024

MYC activity at enhancers drives prognostic transcriptional programs through an epigenetic switch.

Simon T Jakobsen, Rikke A M Jensen, Maria S Madsen, Tina Ravnsborg, Christian S Vaagenso, Majken S Siersbæk, Hjorleifur Einarsson, Robin Andersson, Ole N Jensen, Rasmus Siersbæk

Erratum issuedAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Nature genetics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
6.3field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Dynamic Supercoiling Sponsors Transcription Amplification by MYC.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Simon T JakobsenDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6343-0660
Rikke A M JensenDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9006-1736
Maria S MadsenDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5039-340X
Tina RavnsborgDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6376-621X
Christian S VaagensoDepartment of Biology, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Majken S SiersbækDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.
Hjorleifur EinarssonDepartment of Biology, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Robin AnderssonDepartment of Biology, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1516-879X
Ole N JensenDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1862-8528
Rasmus SiersbækDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark. siersbaek@bmb.sdu.dk.
University of Southern Denmark · DKBroad Institute · USUniversity of Copenhagen · DK

Funding

Kræftens Bekæmpelse (Danish Cancer Society) R231-A13786Novo Nordisk Fonden (Novo Nordisk Foundation) NNF18OC0053276Novo Nordisk Fonden (Novo Nordisk Foundation) NNF20OC0059796Novo Nordisk Fonden (Novo Nordisk Foundation) NNF20OC0061575Novo Nordisk Fonden (Novo Nordisk Foundation) NNF21OC0071373Novo Nordisk Fonden (Novo Nordisk Foundation) NNF21SA0072102Villum Fonden (Villum Foundation) 42066Villum Fonden (Villum Foundation) 7292
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The transcription factor MYC is overexpressed in most cancers, where it drives multiple hallmarks of cancer progression. MYC is known to promote oncogenic transcription by binding to active promoters. In addition, MYC has also been shown to invade distal enhancers when expressed at oncogenic levels, but this enhancer binding has been proposed to have low gene-regulatory potential. Here, we demonstrate that MYC directly regulates enhancer activity to promote cancer type-specific gene programs predictive of poor patient prognosis. MYC induces transcription of enhancer RNA through recruitment of RNA polymerase II (RNAPII), rather than regulating RNAPII pause-release, as is the case at promoters. This process is mediated by MYC-induced H3K9 demethylation and acetylation by GCN5, leading to enhancer-specific BRD4 recruitment through its bromodomains, which facilitates RNAPII recruitment. We propose that MYC drives prognostic cancer type-specific gene programs through induction of an enhancer-specific epigenetic switch, which can be targeted by BET and GCN5 inhibitors.

Indexed as

NeoplasmsTranscription FactorsBromodomain Containing ProteinsCell Cycle ProteinsEnhancer Elements, GeneticEpigenesis, GeneticHumansNuclear ProteinsPrognosisProto-Oncogene Proteins c-mycRNA Polymerase IIBRD4 protein, humanBromodomain Containing ProteinsCell Cycle ProteinsNuclear ProteinsProto-Oncogene Proteins c-mycRNA Polymerase IITranscription Factors

Identifiers

PMID38454021
OpenAlexW4392553433

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.