ArticleScientific reports2024
The role of fines in espresso extraction dynamics.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The impact of particle size distribution of coffee grounds on espresso extraction was explored. Finely ground coffee for espresso has a characteristically bimodal particle size distribution. For a given median grind size, different grinding technologies can yield a different share of fines (particles < 100 µm). We performed espresso extractions for a range of median particle sizes and systematically varying the share of fines by adding sieved fines to the coffee grounds. Dynamic beverage weights, extraction percentage, extraction time and dynamic headspace PTR-MS (proton-transfer mass spectrometer) analysis and sensory evaluation of the resulting brews were measured. We show that the share of fines plays a key role in the espresso extraction flow rate. An increase of share of fines decreases coffee bed permeability, leads to reduced flow rates and longer extraction times. A statistical model using partial least squares regression of the particle size distributions of coffee grounds confirms that fines decrease the coffee bed permeability. The PTR-MS analysis shows a non-linear increase of aroma compounds in the cup with increasing extraction yield. Our hypothesis is that both extraction efficiency and post-extraction evaporative losses of aroma compounds influence the final aroma compound concentrations in the cup.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.