Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38453896›Full record

ArticleTranslational psychiatry2024

Association between resting-state connectivity patterns in the defensive system network and treatment response in spider phobia-a replication approach.

Elisabeth J Leehr, Fabian R Seeger, Joscha Böhnlein, Bettina Gathmann, Thomas Straube, Kati Roesmann, Markus Junghöfer, Hanna Schwarzmeier, Niklas Siminski, Martin J Herrmann and 7 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Translational psychiatry, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Elisabeth J Leehr *Institute for Translational Psychiatry, University of Münster, Münster, Germany. leehr@uni-muenster.de.ORCID 0000-0002-9264-5003
Fabian R Seeger *Department of Psychiatry, Psychosomatics, and Psychotherapy, Center for Mental Health, University Hospital of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.
Joscha BöhnleinInstitute for Translational Psychiatry, University of Münster, Münster, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-9870-5599
Bettina GathmannInstitute of Medical Psychology and Systems Neuroscience, University of Münster, Münster, Germany.
Thomas StraubeInstitute of Medical Psychology and Systems Neuroscience, University of Münster, Münster, Germany.
Kati RoesmannOtto-Creutzfeld Center for Cognitive and Behavioral Neuroscience, University of Münster, Münster, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-6940-3551
Markus JunghöferOtto-Creutzfeld Center for Cognitive and Behavioral Neuroscience, University of Münster, Münster, Germany.
Hanna SchwarzmeierDepartment of Psychiatry, Psychosomatics, and Psychotherapy, Center for Mental Health, University Hospital of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.
Niklas SiminskiDepartment of Psychiatry, Psychosomatics, and Psychotherapy, Center for Mental Health, University Hospital of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.
Martin J HerrmannDepartment of Psychiatry, Psychosomatics, and Psychotherapy, Center for Mental Health, University Hospital of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-9970-2122
Till LanghammerDepartment of Psychology, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Janik GoltermannInstitute for Translational Psychiatry, University of Münster, Münster, Germany.
Dominik GrotegerdInstitute for Translational Psychiatry, University of Münster, Münster, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-8718-0128
Susanne MeinertInstitute for Translational Psychiatry, University of Münster, Münster, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-2177-7161
Nils R WinterInstitute for Translational Psychiatry, University of Münster, Münster, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-6241-1492
Udo DannlowskiInstitute for Translational Psychiatry, University of Münster, Münster, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-0623-3759
Ulrike LuekenDepartment of Psychiatry, Psychosomatics, and Psychotherapy, Center for Mental Health, University Hospital of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-1564-4012
University of Münster · DEUniversitätsklinikum Würzburg · DEHumboldt-Universität zu Berlin · DEHeidelberg University · DEOsnabrück University · DE

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (German Research Foundation) 44541416-TRR 58 (CRC-TRR58, Projects C09 and Z02
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although highly effective on average, exposure-based treatments do not work equally well for all patients with anxiety disorders. The identification of pre-treatment response-predicting patient characteristics may enable patient stratification. Preliminary research highlights the relevance of inhibitory fronto-limbic networks as such. We aimed to identify pre-treatment neural signatures differing between exposure treatment responders and non-responders in spider phobia and to validate results through rigorous replication. Data of a bi-centric intervention study comprised clinical phenotyping and pre-treatment resting-state functional connectivity (rsFC) data of n = 79 patients with spider phobia (discovery sample) and n = 69 patients (replication sample). RsFC data analyses were accomplished using the Matlab-based CONN-toolbox with harmonized analyses protocols at both sites. Treatment response was defined by a reduction of >30% symptom severity from pre- to post-treatment (Spider Phobia Questionnaire Score, primary outcome). Secondary outcome was defined by a reduction of >50% in a Behavioral Avoidance Test (BAT). Mean within-session fear reduction functioned as a process measure for exposure. Compared to non-responders and pre-treatment, results in the discovery sample seemed to indicate that responders exhibited stronger negative connectivity between frontal and limbic structures and were characterized by heightened connectivity between the amygdala and ventral visual pathway regions. Patients exhibiting high within-session fear reduction showed stronger excitatory connectivity within the prefrontal cortex than patients with low within-session fear reduction. Whereas these results could be replicated by another team using the same data (cross-team replication), cross-site replication of the discovery sample findings in the independent replication sample was unsuccessful. Results seem to support negative fronto-limbic connectivity as promising ingredient to enhance response rates in specific phobia but lack sufficient replication. Further research is needed to obtain a valid basis for clinical decision-making and the development of individually tailored treatment options. Notably, future studies should regularly include replication approaches in their protocols.

Indexed as

Phobic DisordersSpidersAnimalsAnxiety DisordersFearHumansMagnetic Resonance Imaging

Identifiers

PMID38453896
PMCPMC10920691
OpenAlexW4392544583

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.