Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38453732›Full record

ArticleMedicine, health care, and philosophy2024

Discovering clinical phronesis.

Donald Boudreau, Hubert Wykretowicz, Elizabeth Anne Kinsella, Abraham Fuks, Michael Saraga

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medicine, health care, and philosophy, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. A Critical Interpretive Literature Review of Phronesis in Medicine.The Journal of medicine and philosophy · 2025
    Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Donald BoudreauFaculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Institute of Health Sciences Education, McGill University, 1110 Pine Avenue West, H3A 1A3, Montreal, Canada. donald.boudreau@mcgill.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0826-9015
Hubert WykretowiczCentre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois, Av. de Beaumont 23, 1011, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Elizabeth Anne KinsellaFaculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Institute of Health Sciences Education, McGill University, 1110 Pine Avenue West, H3A 1A3, Montreal, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7306-7957
Abraham FuksDepartment of Medicine, McGill University, 3647 Peel Street, H3A 1X1, Montreal, Canada.
Michael SaragaGeneral Psychiatry, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois, Route de Cery 60, 1008 Prilly, Lausanne, Switzerland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Phronesis is often described as a 'practical wisdom' adapted to the matters of everyday human life. Phronesis enables one to judge what is at stake in a situation and what means are required to bring about a good outcome. In medicine, phronesis tends to be called upon to deal with ethical issues and to offer a critique of clinical practice as a straightforward instrumental application of scientific knowledge. There is, however, a paucity of empirical studies of phronesis, including in medicine. Using a hermeneutic and phenomenological approach, this inquiry explores how phronesis is manifest in the stories of clinical practice of eleven exemplary physicians. The findings highlight five overarching themes: ethos (or character) of the physician, clinical habitus revealed in physician know-how, encountering the patient with attentiveness, modes of reasoning amidst complexity, and embodied perceptions (such as intuitions or gut feeling). The findings open a discussion about the contingent nature of clinical situations, a hermeneutic mode of clinical thinking, tacit dimensions of being and doing in clinical practice, the centrality of caring relations with patients, and the elusive quality of some aspects of practice. This study deepens understandings of the nature of phronesis within clinical settings and proposes 'Clinical phronesis' as a descriptor for its appearance and role in the daily practice of (exemplary) physicians.

Indexed as

HermeneuticsPhilosophy, MedicalPhysician-Patient RelationsEmpathyHumansPhysiciansClinical practiceExemplary physiciansHermeneutic inquiryPhronesisPractical wisdomQualitative research

Identifiers

PMID38453732
PMCPMC11076326

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.