ArticleAesthetic plastic surgery2024
Keloid and Hypertrophic Scars Treatment.
Article in Aesthetic plastic surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Efficacy and safety of fractional COFrontiers in medicine · 2025Pooled it
- From RCT to mechanistic study: ATRA reverses myofibroblast activation by reprogramming glucose metabolism via HIC1 and PCK1/2 to attenuate hypertrophic scar formation.Military Medical Research · 2026Trial
- Impact of Vitamin D Injection on Keloids and Hypertrophic Scars.Journal of cosmetic dermatology · 2025Trial
- Comparative Efficacy of Combined Carbon Dioxide Fractional Laser and Pulse Dye Laser versus Monotherapy for Hypertrophic Scars: A Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.Aesthetic plastic surgery · 2026Review
- Assessment of keloids recurrence rate in patients treated by brachytherapy versus electron beam radiotherapy versus surgical excision.JPRAS open · 2026Article
- Chirality-Dependent Supramolecular Biomaterials Remodeling of Scar Microenvironment via Integrin-Mediated Regulation for Hypertrophic Scars Therapy.Nano-micro letters · 2026Article
- A multifunctional injectable nanocomposite hydrogel for precision keloid therapy via ECM remodeling and local pruritus relief.Journal of nanobiotechnology · 2026Article
- Modulating hypertrophic scar formation by targeting endothelial transient receptor potential vanilloid-1/nuclear factor kappa-B/interleukin-6 axis to regulate angiogenesis.Burns & trauma · 2026Article
- Sequential Fractional COJournal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- The Potential of Chat-Based Artificial Intelligence Models in Differentiating Between Keloid and Hypertrophic Scars: A Pilot Study.Aesthetic plastic surgery · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundHypertrophic scars are contained within the site of injury and may regress over time, while keloids spread beyond the borders of the initial injury and do not regress. On histologic examination, hypertrophic scars tend to have collagen in a wavy, regular pattern, whereas keloids have no distinct pattern of collagen.
objectiveTo retrospectively analyze improvement in keloid and hypertrophic scars characteristics following treatment with Ablative 10600 nm and a non-Ablative 1570 nm Hybrid Laser Device.
methodsTreatment parameters with the ProScan Hybrid Mode were 40 W/1.3-1.5 ms for the CO2 and 12 W/4 ms for the 1570 nm in a 1:1 ratio. Outcomes were assessed based on physician scar grading as measured by the Vancouver Scar Scale and patient-reported satisfaction. Excel was used for data analysis, and a p value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Adverse events and patient pain were also recorded.
resultsA total of 31 hypertrophic scars and 30 keloid scars were treated. There was a significant reduction in Vancouver Scar Scale scores for both hypertrophic and keloid scars (62% ± 8% and 58% ± 7%; p = 2.6E-17 and p = 8.29E-26, respectively). In a scar-based comparison, a statistically significant difference was observed for all measures reflecting favorable outcomes for hypertrophic scars (VSS, p = 1.1E-05; satisfaction, p = 0.0112; pain, p = 0.00081). Only one adverse event was reported, a superficial burn treated with topical antibiotics.
conclusionsThe device was found to be safe and effective, with promising results for the treatment of hypertrophic and keloid scars. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE II: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266.
Indexed as
Identifiers
38453710What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.