Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38453705›Full record

ArticleTAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik2024

Portability of genomic predictions trained on sparse factorial designs across two maize silage breeding cycles.

Alizarine Lorenzi, Cyril Bauland, Sophie Pin, Delphine Madur, Valérie Combes, Carine Palaffre, Colin Guillaume, Gaëtan Touzy, Tristan Mary-Huard, Alain Charcosset and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Alizarine LorenziUniversité Paris-Saclay, INRAE, CNRS, AgroParisTech, Génétique Quantitative et Evolution (GQE) - Le Moulon, 91190, Gif-Sur-Yvette, France.
Cyril BaulandUniversité Paris-Saclay, INRAE, CNRS, AgroParisTech, Génétique Quantitative et Evolution (GQE) - Le Moulon, 91190, Gif-Sur-Yvette, France.
Sophie PinUniversité Paris-Saclay, INRAE, CNRS, AgroParisTech, Génétique Quantitative et Evolution (GQE) - Le Moulon, 91190, Gif-Sur-Yvette, France.
Delphine MadurUniversité Paris-Saclay, INRAE, CNRS, AgroParisTech, Génétique Quantitative et Evolution (GQE) - Le Moulon, 91190, Gif-Sur-Yvette, France.
Valérie CombesUniversité Paris-Saclay, INRAE, CNRS, AgroParisTech, Génétique Quantitative et Evolution (GQE) - Le Moulon, 91190, Gif-Sur-Yvette, France.
Carine PalaffreUE 0394 SMH, INRAE, 2297 Route de l'INRA, 40390, Saint-Martin-de-Hinx, France.
Colin GuillaumeMaïsadour Semences SA, 40001, Mont-de-Marsan Cedex, France.
Gaëtan TouzyRAGT2n, Genetics and Analytics Unit, 12510, Druelle, France.
Tristan Mary-HuardUniversité Paris-Saclay, INRAE, CNRS, AgroParisTech, Génétique Quantitative et Evolution (GQE) - Le Moulon, 91190, Gif-Sur-Yvette, France.
Alain CharcossetUniversité Paris-Saclay, INRAE, CNRS, AgroParisTech, Génétique Quantitative et Evolution (GQE) - Le Moulon, 91190, Gif-Sur-Yvette, France.
Laurence MoreauUniversité Paris-Saclay, INRAE, CNRS, AgroParisTech, Génétique Quantitative et Evolution (GQE) - Le Moulon, 91190, Gif-Sur-Yvette, France. laurence.moreau@inrae.fr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7195-1327

Funding

ANRT 2020/0032Saclay Plant Sciences-SPS ANR-17-EUR-0007
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

key messageWe validated the efficiency of genomic predictions calibrated on sparse factorial training sets to predict the next generation of hybrids and tested different strategies for updating predictions along generations. Genomic selection offers new prospects for revisiting hybrid breeding schemes by replacing extensive phenotyping of individuals with genomic predictions. Finding the ideal design for training genomic prediction models is still an open question. Previous studies have shown promising predictive abilities using sparse factorial instead of tester-based training sets to predict single-cross hybrids from the same generation. This study aims to further investigate the use of factorials and their optimization to predict line general combining abilities (GCAs) and hybrid values across breeding cycles. It relies on two breeding cycles of a maize reciprocal genomic selection scheme involving multiparental connected reciprocal populations from flint and dent complementary heterotic groups selected for silage performances. Selection based on genomic predictions trained on a factorial design resulted in a significant genetic gain for dry matter yield in the new generation. Results confirmed the efficiency of sparse factorial training sets to predict candidate line GCAs and hybrid values across breeding cycles. Compared to a previous study based on the first generation, the advantage of factorial over tester training sets appeared lower across generations. Updating factorial training sets by adding single-cross hybrids between selected lines from the previous generation or a random subset of hybrids from the new generation both improved predictive abilities. The CDmean criterion helped determine the set of single-crosses to phenotype to update the training set efficiently. Our results validated the efficiency of sparse factorial designs for calibrating hybrid genomic prediction experimentally and showed the benefit of updating it along generations.

Indexed as

Hybridization, GeneticZea maysGenomicsPlant BreedingSilage

Identifiers

PMID38453705
PMCPMC11341662

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.