ArticleBMJ global health2024
Designathons in health research: a global systematic review.
Article in BMJ global health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.
- Using Online Media to Increase the Awareness and Uptake of Preexposure Prophylaxis for HIV Among Asian-Born Men Who Have Sex With Men Living in Australia: An Open-Label Randomized Controlled Trial.Open forum infectious diseases · 2025Trial
- Advancing Evidence-Based Health Innovation in Brazil: A Qualitative Program Evaluation of a Binational Educational Initiative to Build Interprofessional Capacity.Nursing reports (Pavia, Italy) · 2026Article
- Bridging the gap between public health, academia and policy.BMJ global health · 2026Article
- Addressing priority gaps in access and quality of NCD services in primary care settings in Rural Kenya: a participatory approach to intervention development.BMC primary care · 2026Article
- The Patient Monitoring Roundtable as Catalyst for Health Care Innovation: Case Study.Journal of participatory medicine · 2026Article
- "O for KP": an evidence review on recentering HIV prevention and PrEP delivery for key populations and the underserved.Current opinion in infectious diseases · 2026Review
- Fostering innovation and building youth capacity in global health: design, implementation, and evaluation of a youth-led digital health hackathon.BMC medical education · 2026Article
- A designathon to collaboratively develop sustainable HIV prevention services for youth with community-based organizations in Nigeria.PloS one · 2026Article
- Participatory implementation science to enhance knowledge and build the capacity to increase the uptake and sustainability of HPV vaccination among girls in Nigeria.Journal of health, population, and nutrition · 2025Article
- Music as a strategy to improve hypertension and stroke management: evidence from a crowdsourcing open call and designathon in Nigeria.BMC public health · 2025Observational
- Mixed Methods Evaluation of the Impact of Allied Health - Translating Research into Practice (AH-TRIP) Program on the Knowledge Translation Capacity of the Allied Health Workforce.International journal of health policy and management · 2025Article
- Association between mobile phone, self-efficacy and dependency among elderly people: a community-based study.mHealth · 2025Article
- Building capacity for HIV and implementation science among students in the United States: the stimulating training and access to HIV research experiences (STAR) program.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
- Improving training on hepatitis B research in Nigeria: Findings from an innovation bootcamp to strengthen capacity.PLOS global public health · 2025Article
- Co-designing interventions to strengthen the primary health care system for the management of hypertension and type 2 diabetes in China.The Lancet regional health. Western Pacific · 2024Article
- A designathon to co-create HPV screening and vaccination approaches for mothers and daughters in Nigeria: findings from a community-led participatory event.BMC infectious diseases · 2024Article
- Factors associated with HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis use among Asian men who have sex with men in Sydney and Melbourne, Australia: a cross-sectional study.The Lancet regional health. Western Pacific · 2024Article
- Awareness Levels About Specialty Services Offered by the Faculty of Dentistry in Sebha, Libya.Cureus · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 8 institutions in 6 countries.
Funding
Abstract
introductionA designathon is a three-stage participatory activity informed by design thinking. There is a growing literature on designathons in health. This study synthesised designathons' effectiveness and implementation-related factors to address health challenges.
methodsWe searched Cochrane Library, Embase, PubMed, Scopus and the ClinicalTrials.gov registry for articles containing primary data on designathons for health from their dates of inception to 29 November 2022. We retrieved additional studies from citation searching and a complementary open call. We synthesised data on designathons' effectiveness (ie, engagement, outputs and implementation), required resources and implementation-related factors (ie, resources, facilitators, barriers, strengths and limitations). We assessed the risk of bias using a checklist adapted from Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal tools.
resultsIn total, 4973 citations were identified, and 42 studies were included. In total, 26 studies (62%) were from high-income countries. The median number of total participants was 49, divided into a median of 8 teams. The duration of the intensive collaboration phase ranged from 3 hours to 7 days. Common evaluation criteria were feasibility, innovation and impact. Idea and prototype outputs included mobile phone applications, educational programmes and medical devices. Interventions developed from a designathon was estimated to be highly cost-effective. The most common facilitators were interdisciplinary participants and high-quality mentorship. The most common barriers were suboptimal execution of the events, difficulties in balancing interdisciplinary participants across teams and limited support for participants along the process. There were limited data on required resources and further implementation of solutions after designathons.
conclusionGiven designathons' adaptability in terms of budget, mode of delivery, type of output and involvement of diverse participants, including end users, designathons can be implemented in a wide range of contexts to address various health issues. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42023389685.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.