Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38453193›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2024

Evaluations of virtual exercise programmes for adults with mobility limitations: a scoping review protocol incorporating an equity lens to inform the development of strategies to optimise participation of under-represented groups.

Renato Barbosa Dos Santos, Jing Lin, Anchal Badwal, Hardeep Singh, Susan Brenda Jaglal, Christina Sperling, Nancy Margaret Salbach

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Renato Barbosa Dos SantosRehabilitation Sciences Institute, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada renatob.santos@utoronto.ca.ORCID 0000-0003-2404-190X
Jing LinRehabilitation Sciences Institute, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Anchal BadwalDepartment of Physical Therapy, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Hardeep SinghDepartment of Occupational Science & Occupational Therapy, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-7429-5580
Susan Brenda JaglalRehabilitation Sciences Institute, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-2930-1443
Christina SperlingMarch of Dimes Canada, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0009-0005-1252-1617
Nancy Margaret SalbachRehabilitation Sciences Institute, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-6178-0691
University Health Network · CAUniversity of Toronto · CAMarch of Dimes Canada · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionFor individuals with mobility limitations, virtual exercise programmes can address the challenges of in-person participation in community exercise programmes. A synthesis of studies of virtual exercise programmes targeting mobility limitations provided outside of conventional rehabilitation services and strategies used to optimise equitable access and inclusivity in these programmes is lacking. We aim to characterise evaluations of virtual exercise programmes for adults with mobility limitations, and the nature of and extent to which equity, diversity and inclusion considerations are integrated in the research process. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: A scoping review following a six-stage methodological framework, including a consultation exercise, is proposed. A comprehensive strategy will be used to search Medline, Embase, PEDro, CINAHL and Scopus to identify peer-reviewed studies evaluating virtual exercise programmes for adults with mobility limitations living in the community. Three trained reviewers will select studies independently. Data (eg, study methodology, programme structure and content, participant characteristics) will be extracted using a standardised form, and collated and summarised using quantitative and qualitative methods. The PROGRESS-Plus and International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health frameworks will be used to classify participant characteristics and study outcomes, respectively. During the consultation exercise, key knowledge users, including exercise participants, programme providers and coordinators, and members of community organisations for persons living with disabilities and under-represented groups, will be asked to provide insights regarding the applicability of review findings. A directed content analysis of data from the consultation exercise will be performed. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The research ethics board at the University of Toronto approved the consultation exercise. Findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications and conference presentations. Findings will enhance understanding of current research evaluating virtual exercise programmes and inform future research and strategies for promoting equitable access and outcomes for individuals with mobility limitations. REGISTRATION DETAILS: https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/X5JMA.

Indexed as

Mobility LimitationPersons with DisabilitiesAdultExerciseExercise TherapyHumansResearch DesignScoping Reviews as Topichealth equityhealth services for the agedneurologyphysical therapy modalitiesrehabilitation medicinetelemedicine

Identifiers

PMID38453193
PMCPMC10921544
OpenAlexW4392553867

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.