Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38452862›Full record

ArticleJournal of biomedical informatics2024

A scoping review of fair machine learning techniques when using real-world data.

Yu Huang, Jingchuan Guo, Wei-Han Chen, Hsin-Yueh Lin, Huilin Tang, Fei Wang, Hua Xu, Jiang Bian

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of biomedical informatics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Current research landscape and future prospects of in silico modeling approaches for atopic dermatitis.JID innovations : skin science from molecules to population health · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Generative Artificial Intelligence for Health Technology Assessment: Opportunities, Challenges, and Policy Considerations: An ISPOR Working Group Report.Value in health : the journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research · 2025
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Fair prediction of 2-year stroke risk in patients with atrial fibrillation.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2024
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Yu HuangDepartment of Health Outcomes and Biomedical Informatics, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.
Jingchuan GuoPharmaceutical Outcomes & Policy, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.
Wei-Han ChenPharmaceutical Outcomes & Policy, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.
Hsin-Yueh LinPharmaceutical Outcomes & Policy, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.
Huilin TangPharmaceutical Outcomes & Policy, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.
Fei WangDepartment of Population Health Sciences, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA; Institute of Artificial Intelligence for Digital Health, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA.
Hua XuSection of Biomedical Informatics and Data Science, School of Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA.
Jiang BianDepartment of Health Outcomes and Biomedical Informatics, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA. Electronic address: bianjiang@ufl.edu.

Funding

Using social networks to map and evaluate team science across CTSA hubsUL1TR001427 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI MITCHELL, DUANE A. · 2015 to 2024
$37.2M
An end-to-end informatics framework to study Multiple Chronic Conditions (MCC)'s impact on Alzheimer's disease using harmonized electronic health recordsR01AG083039 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCI CTR HOUSTON · PI BIAN, JIANG, JIANG, XIAOQIAN · 2023 to 2025
$3.4M
Disparities of Alzheimer's disease progression in Sexual Minority IndividualsR01AG080624 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI Jiang Bian, Yi Guo · 2023 to 2026
$3.1M
Artificial Intelligence and Counterfactually Actionable Responses to End HIV (AI-CARE-HIV)R01AI172875 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI Jiang Bian, Mattia Prosperi · 2023 to 2026
$2.8M
Supplement of NIDDK R01 newer GLDs and Clinical OutcomesR01DK133465 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI GUO, JINGCHUAN, SHAO, HUI · 2022 to 2025
$2.8M
Post-Acute Sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 Infection and Subsequent Disease Progression in Individuals with AD/ADRD: Influence of the Social and Environmental Determinants of HealthRF1AG084178 · NIA · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI BIAN, JIANG, HU, HUI · 2023 to 2023
$2.6M
Using Real-world Data to Assess the Burden of Diabetes in Children and Adolescents in FloridaU18DP006512 · DP · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI BIAN, JIANG, GUO, YI · 2020 to 2024
$1.4M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001427NCCDPHP CDC HHS U18 DP006512NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI172875NIA NIH HHS R01 AG080624NIA NIH HHS R01 AG083039NIA NIH HHS RF1 AG084178NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK133465
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe integration of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) in health care to aid clinical decisions is widespread. However, as AI and ML take important roles in health care, there are concerns about AI and ML associated fairness and bias. That is, an AI tool may have a disparate impact, with its benefits and drawbacks unevenly distributed across societal strata and subpopulations, potentially exacerbating existing health inequities. Thus, the objectives of this scoping review were to summarize existing literature and identify gaps in the topic of tackling algorithmic bias and optimizing fairness in AI/ML models using real-world data (RWD) in health care domains.

methodsWe conducted a thorough review of techniques for assessing and optimizing AI/ML model fairness in health care when using RWD in health care domains. The focus lies on appraising different quantification metrics for accessing fairness, publicly accessible datasets for ML fairness research, and bias mitigation approaches.

resultsWe identified 11 papers that are focused on optimizing model fairness in health care applications. The current research on mitigating bias issues in RWD is limited, both in terms of disease variety and health care applications, as well as the accessibility of public datasets for ML fairness research. Existing studies often indicate positive outcomes when using pre-processing techniques to address algorithmic bias. There remain unresolved questions within the field that require further research, which includes pinpointing the root causes of bias in ML models, broadening fairness research in AI/ML with the use of RWD and exploring its implications in healthcare settings, and evaluating and addressing bias in multi-modal data.

conclusionThis paper provides useful reference material and insights to researchers regarding AI/ML fairness in real-world health care data and reveals the gaps in the field. Fair AI/ML in health care is a burgeoning field that requires a heightened research focus to cover diverse applications and different types of RWD.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceMachine LearningBenchmarkingHumansResearch PersonnelBias mitigationFair machine learningReal-world data

Identifiers

PMID38452862
PMCPMC11146346

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.