ArticleJournal of biomedical informatics2024
A scoping review of fair machine learning techniques when using real-world data.
Article in Journal of biomedical informatics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
23 citing papers in PubMed.
- Explainable Prediction of Prolonged Work Disability After Occupational Injury and Disease: Temporal Validation and Sex-Specific Performance.Journal of occupational rehabilitation · 2026Article
- Pre-Deployment Audit of Actionability and Equity in Severe Tooth Loss Prediction Using Constrained Algorithmic Recourse and Temporal Validation.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Current research landscape and future prospects of in silico modeling approaches for atopic dermatitis.JID innovations : skin science from molecules to population health · 2026Review
- Adaptation of a fair individualized polysocial risk score for hospitalization risk prediction.JAMIA open · 2026Article
- TRIAGE: Trustworthy Reporting and Assessment for Clinical Gain and Effectiveness of AI Models.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Wearable Biosensing and Machine Learning for Data-Driven Training and Coaching Support.Biosensors · 2026Review
- Reimagining paediatric care: technology, trust, and the global movement for child-centred innovation.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Review
- Advancing health equity in proactive health management: from data underrepresentation and algorithmic bias to a closed-loop governance framework.Frontiers in public health · 2026Review
- Continuous assurance for AI-driven clinical decision support systems.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2026Review
- From Biomedical Datasets to Fairness-Aware Recommendations: An Integrated Data Orchestration Pipeline for Binary Clinical Predictions.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2026Article
- A scoping review and evidence gap analysis of clinical AI fairness.NPJ digital medicine · 2025Article
- Exploring trade-offs in equitable stroke risk prediction with parity-constrained and race-free models.Artificial intelligence in medicine · 2025Article
- Generative Artificial Intelligence for Health Technology Assessment: Opportunities, Challenges, and Policy Considerations: An ISPOR Working Group Report.Value in health : the journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research · 2025Review
- Achieving health equity in immune disease: leveraging big data and artificial intelligence in an evolving health system landscape.Frontiers in big data · 2025Review
- Machine learning to predict extubation success using the spontaneous breathing trial, objective cough measurement, and diaphragmatic contraction velocity: Secondary analysis of the COBRE-US trial.Journal of critical care medicine (Universitatea de Medicina si Farmacie din Targu-Mures) · 2025Article
- Fair prediction of 2-year stroke risk in patients with atrial fibrillation.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2024Article
- Article
- Simulated misuse of large language models and clinical credit systems.NPJ digital medicine · 2024Review
- Evolution of digital twins in precision health applications: a scoping review study.Research square · 2024Article
- Machine Learning Models for Predicting Mortality in Critically Ill Patients with Sepsis-Associated Acute Kidney Injury: A Systematic Review.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveThe integration of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) in health care to aid clinical decisions is widespread. However, as AI and ML take important roles in health care, there are concerns about AI and ML associated fairness and bias. That is, an AI tool may have a disparate impact, with its benefits and drawbacks unevenly distributed across societal strata and subpopulations, potentially exacerbating existing health inequities. Thus, the objectives of this scoping review were to summarize existing literature and identify gaps in the topic of tackling algorithmic bias and optimizing fairness in AI/ML models using real-world data (RWD) in health care domains.
methodsWe conducted a thorough review of techniques for assessing and optimizing AI/ML model fairness in health care when using RWD in health care domains. The focus lies on appraising different quantification metrics for accessing fairness, publicly accessible datasets for ML fairness research, and bias mitigation approaches.
resultsWe identified 11 papers that are focused on optimizing model fairness in health care applications. The current research on mitigating bias issues in RWD is limited, both in terms of disease variety and health care applications, as well as the accessibility of public datasets for ML fairness research. Existing studies often indicate positive outcomes when using pre-processing techniques to address algorithmic bias. There remain unresolved questions within the field that require further research, which includes pinpointing the root causes of bias in ML models, broadening fairness research in AI/ML with the use of RWD and exploring its implications in healthcare settings, and evaluating and addressing bias in multi-modal data.
conclusionThis paper provides useful reference material and insights to researchers regarding AI/ML fairness in real-world health care data and reveals the gaps in the field. Fair AI/ML in health care is a burgeoning field that requires a heightened research focus to cover diverse applications and different types of RWD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.