Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38452770›Full record

ArticleCell reports methods2024

GAUSS-EM, guided accumulation of ultrathin serial sections with a static magnetic field for volume electron microscopy.

Kara A Fulton, Paul V Watkins, Kevin L Briggman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cell reports methods, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. RAEM: random-access electron microscopy for revisitable 3D imaging.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Photoemission electron microscopy for connectomics.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Array tomography: trails to discovery.Methods in microscopy · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Frontiers in neuroscience · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Kara A FultonDepartment of Computational Neuroethology, Max Planck Institute for Neurobiology of Behavior - caesar, 53175 Bonn, NRW, Germany.
Paul V WatkinsDepartment of Computational Neuroethology, Max Planck Institute for Neurobiology of Behavior - caesar, 53175 Bonn, NRW, Germany.
Kevin L BriggmanDepartment of Computational Neuroethology, Max Planck Institute for Neurobiology of Behavior - caesar, 53175 Bonn, NRW, Germany. Electronic address: kevin.briggman@mpinb.mpg.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Serial sectioning electron microscopy (EM) of millimeter-scale three-dimensional (3D) anatomical volumes requires the collection of thousands of ultrathin sections. Here, we report a high-throughput automated approach, GAUSS-EM (guided accumulation of ultrathin serial sections-EM), utilizing a static magnetic field to collect and densely pack thousands of sections onto individual silicon wafers. The method is capable of sectioning hundreds of microns of tissue per day at section thicknesses down to 35 nm. Relative to other automated volume EM approaches, GAUSS-EM democratizes the ability to collect large 3D EM volumes because it is simple and inexpensive to implement. We present two exemplar EM volumes of a zebrafish eye and mouse olfactory bulb collected with the method.

Indexed as

Volume Electron MicroscopyZebrafishAnimalsMiceMicroscopy, ElectronSiliconSiliconconnectomicsCP: Imagingelectron microscopyserial sectioningvolumetric electron microscopy

Identifiers

PMID38452770
PMCPMC10985227

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.