Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38452712›Full record

ArticleUltrasonics sonochemistry2024

On efficient modelling of radical production in cavitation assisted reactors.

Suat Canberk Ozan, Pascal Jan Muller, Jan Hendrik Cloete

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ultrasonics sonochemistry, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Suat Canberk OzanProcess Technology Department, SINTEF Industry, S.P. Andersens veg 15B, NO-7031 Trondheim, Norway; Department of Chemical Engineering, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), N-7491 Trondheim, Norway. Electronic address: canberk.ozan@sintef.no.
Pascal Jan MullerDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, ETH Zurich, D-MAVT Leonhardstrasse 21, 8092 Zurich, Switzerland.
Jan Hendrik CloeteProcess Technology Department, SINTEF Industry, S.P. Andersens veg 15B, NO-7031 Trondheim, Norway.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Process intensification by cavitation is gaining widespread attention due to the benefits that the intense bubble collapse conditions can provide, yet, several knowledge gaps exist in the modelling of such systems. This work studies the numerical prediction of single bubble dynamics and the various approaches that can be employed to estimate the changes in the chemical composition of cavitating bubbles. Specific emphasis is placed on the prediction of the radical production rates during bubble collapse and the computational performance, with the aim of coupling the single bubble dynamics to flow models for reactor hydrodynamics. The results reveal that the choice of chemical reaction approach has virtually no effect on the bubble dynamics, whereas the predicted radical production rates can differ substantially. It is found that evaluating the radical production only on temperature peaks, an approach commonly followed in literature, may result in the most erroneous estimations (on average 12.8 times larger than those of the full kinetic model), while a simplified kinetic model yields more accurate predictions (2.3 times larger) at the expense of increased computational times. Continuous evaluation of the bubble content by assuming equilibrium when the bubble temperature is above a certain threshold (≈1500K) is shown to be capable of predicting total radical production values close to those estimated by solving the kinetics of a detailed reaction model (19.8% difference), as well as requiring only 22.2% more computational costs compared to simulations without chemical reaction modelling. Such an equilibrium approach is therefore recommended for future studies aiming to couple flow simulations with single bubble dynamics to accurately predict radical production rates in cavitation devices, involving numerous bubbles following different flow trajectories. Furthermore, an algebraic expression that successfully approximates the full kinetic simulation results is proposed as a function of the initial nucleus size and the time integral of the liquid pressure when it is under vapor pressure. Such a model can be applied in modelling efforts that do not require local instantaneous radical concentrations, and paves the way for efficient closure modelling of radical production in CFD simulations of hydrodynamic reactors.

Indexed as

CavitationGibbs minimizationNumerical simulationsRadical productionReaction modellingSingle bubble dynamics

Identifiers

PMID38452712
PMCPMC11636817

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.