Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38452315›Full record

ArticleJCO oncology practice2024

Health Care Contact Days Among Older Cancer Survivors.

Arjun Gupta, Emma D Chant, Supriya Mohile, Rachel I Vogel, Helen M Parsons, Anne H Blaes, Christopher M Booth, Gabrielle B Rocque, Stacie B Dusetzina, Ishani Ganguli

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JCO oncology practice, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Time toxicity in cancer care: a systematic review of definitions and measurement methods.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. The experience of time toxicity in cancer patients: a meta-synthesis of qualitative research.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Review
  4. Healthcare contact days in cancer survivors relative to those with no cancer history.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Rates of medical service utilisation in people with and without cancer: an Australian cohort study.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Patient-, care partner-, and clinician-proposed solutions to address the time toxicity of cancer care.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2025
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. "The biggest challenge is there's never a routine": a qualitative study of the time burdens of cancer care at home.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2025
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Arjun GuptaUniversity of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN.ORCID 0000-0003-0875-4731
Emma D ChantDivision of General Internal Medicine and Primary Care, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA.ORCID 0000-0002-7485-2551
Supriya MohileDepartment of Medicine, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY.
Rachel I VogelUniversity of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN.ORCID 0000-0003-0149-8464
Helen M ParsonsUniversity of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN.ORCID 0000-0003-3822-9858
Anne H BlaesUniversity of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN.
Christopher M BoothDepartment of Oncology, Queen's University, Kingston, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-1353-3653
Gabrielle B RocqueUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL.ORCID 0000-0003-4188-9785
Stacie B DusetzinaDepartment of Health Policy, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN.ORCID 0000-0002-3907-9196
Ishani GanguliDivision of General Internal Medicine and Primary Care, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA.ORCID 0000-0002-3793-0995

Funding

URCC NCORP Research BaseUG1CA189961 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI Michelle C Janelsins, KAREN M. MUSTIAN · 2014 to 2026
$67.7M
The Role of Virtual Care in Improving Primary Care Access and Continuity for At-Risk Multimorbid Older AdultsK23AG068240 · NIA · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI GANGULI, ISHANI · 2021 to 2025
$842k
NCI NIH HHS UG1 CA189961NIA NIH HHS K23 AG068240
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeHealth care contact days-days spent receiving health care outside the home-represent an intuitive, practical, and person-centered measure of time consumed by health care.

methodsWe linked 2019 Medicare Current Beneficiary Survey and traditional Medicare claims data for community-dwelling older adults with a history of cancer. We identified contact days (ie, spent in a hospital, emergency department, skilled nursing facility, or inpatient hospice or receiving ambulatory care including an office visit, procedure, treatment, imaging, or test) and described patterns of total and ambulatory contact days. Using weighted Poisson regression models, we identified factors associated with contact days.

resultsWe included 1,168 older adults representing 4.51 million cancer survivors (median age, 76.4 years, 52.8% women). The median (IQR) time from cancer diagnosis was 65 (27-126) months. In 2019, these adults had mean (standard deviation) total contact days of 28.4 (27.6) and ambulatory contact days of 24.2 (23.6). These included days for tests (8.0 [8.8]), imaging (3.6 [4.1]), visits with any clinicians (12.4 [11.5]), and visits with primary care clinicians (4.4 [4.7]), and nononcology specialists (7.1 [9.4]) specifically. Sixty-four percent of days with a nonvisit ambulatory service (eg, a test) were not on the same day as a clinician visit. Factors associated with more total contact days included younger age, lower income, more chronic conditions, poor self-rated health, and tendency to "go to doctor as soon as feel bad."

conclusionOlder adult cancer survivors spent nearly 1 month of the year receiving health care outside the home. This care was largely ambulatory, often delivered by nononcologists, and varied by factors beyond clinical characteristics. These results highlight the need to recognize patient burdens and improve survivorship care delivery, including through care coordination.

Indexed as

Cancer SurvivorsAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansMaleMedicareNeoplasmsUnited States

Identifiers

PMID38452315
PMCPMC11268556

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.