Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38452293›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA2024

Personalizing renal replacement therapy initiation in the intensive care unit: a reinforcement learning-based strategy with external validation on the AKIKI randomized controlled trials.

François Grolleau, François Petit, Stéphane Gaudry, Élise Diard, Jean-Pierre Quenot, Didier Dreyfuss, Viet-Thi Tran, Raphaël Porcher

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Systematic Exploration of Hospital Cost Variability: A Conformal Prediction-Based Outlier Detection Method for Electronic Health Records.AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science proceedings. AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

François GrolleauUniversité Paris Cité and Université Sorbonne Paris Nord, INSERM, INRAE, Center for Research in Epidemiology and StatisticS (CRESS), Paris, F-75004, France.
François PetitUniversité Paris Cité and Université Sorbonne Paris Nord, INSERM, INRAE, Center for Research in Epidemiology and StatisticS (CRESS), Paris, F-75004, France.
Stéphane GaudryService de Réanimation Médico-Chirurgicale, AP-HP, Hôpital Avicenne, Université Sorbonne Paris Nord, Bobigny, 93430, France.
Élise DiardUniversité Paris Cité and Université Sorbonne Paris Nord, INSERM, INRAE, Center for Research in Epidemiology and StatisticS (CRESS), Paris, F-75004, France.
Jean-Pierre QuenotDepartment of Intensive Care, François Mitterrand University Hospital, Dijon, 21000, France.
Didier DreyfussINSERM UMR S1155, Sorbonne Université, CORAKID, Hôpital Tenon, Paris, 75020, France.
Viet-Thi TranUniversité Paris Cité and Université Sorbonne Paris Nord, INSERM, INRAE, Center for Research in Epidemiology and StatisticS (CRESS), Paris, F-75004, France.
Raphaël PorcherUniversité Paris Cité and Université Sorbonne Paris Nord, INSERM, INRAE, Center for Research in Epidemiology and StatisticS (CRESS), Paris, F-75004, France.ORCID 0000-0002-5277-4679

Funding

French Agence Nationale de la RechercheFrench Agence Nationale de la Recherche ANR-22-CPJ1-0047-01Université Paris Cité ANR-18-IDEX-0001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe timely initiation of renal replacement therapy (RRT) for acute kidney injury (AKI) requires sequential decision-making tailored to individuals' evolving characteristics. To learn and validate optimal strategies for RRT initiation, we used reinforcement learning on clinical data from routine care and randomized controlled trials. MATERIALS AND

methodsWe used the MIMIC-III database for development and AKIKI trials for validation. Participants were adult ICU patients with severe AKI receiving mechanical ventilation or catecholamine infusion. We used a doubly robust estimator to learn when to start RRT after the occurrence of severe AKI for three days in a row. We developed a "crude strategy" maximizing the population-level hospital-free days at day 60 (HFD60) and a "stringent strategy" recommending RRT when there is significant evidence of benefit for an individual. For validation, we evaluated the causal effects of implementing our learned strategies versus following current best practices on HFD60.

resultsWe included 3748 patients in the development set and 1068 in the validation set. Through external validation, the crude and stringent strategies yielded an average difference of 13.7 [95% CI -5.3 to 35.7] and 14.9 [95% CI -3.2 to 39.2] HFD60, respectively, compared to current best practices. The stringent strategy led to initiating RRT within 3 days in 14% of patients versus 38% under best practices. DISCUSSION: Implementing our strategies could improve the average number of days that ICU patients spend alive and outside the hospital while sparing RRT for many.

conclusionWe developed and validated a practical and interpretable dynamic decision support system for RRT initiation in the ICU.

Indexed as

Acute Kidney InjuryRenal Replacement TherapyAdultCritical IllnessHumansIntensive Care UnitsRandomized Controlled Trials as Topicacute kidney injurycausal inferencepersonalized medicinereinforcement learningrenal replacement therapy

Identifiers

PMID38452293
PMCPMC11031229

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.