Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38452124›Full record

ArticlePloS one2024

Rehabilitation and release of orphaned Eurasian lynx (Lynx lynx) in Europe: Implications for management and conservation.

Anja Molinari-Jobin, Fridolin Zimmermann, Stéphanie Borel, Luc Le Grand, Elena Iannino, Ole Anders, Elisa Belotti, Ludek Bufka, Duško Ćirović, Nolwenn Drouet-Hoguet and 30 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

40 authors.

Anja Molinari-JobinStiftung KORA, Ittigen, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-3729-2532
Fridolin ZimmermannStiftung KORA, Ittigen, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0003-3861-246X
Stéphanie BorelVetsuisse Faculty, Departement of Infectious diseases and Pathobiology, Institute for Fish and Wildlife Health, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Luc Le GrandStiftung KORA, Ittigen, Switzerland.
Elena IanninoProgetto Lince Italia, Tarvisio, Italy.ORCID 0009-0009-8474-1861
Ole AndersHarz National Park, Wernigerode, Germany.
Elisa BelottiFaculty of Forestry and Wood Sciences, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Prague, Czech Republic.
Ludek BufkaDepartment of Nature Protection, Šumava National Park Administration, Kašperské Hory, Czech Republic.
Duško ĆirovićFaculty of Biology, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia.
Nolwenn Drouet-HoguetEquipe Loup-Lynx, Office français de la biodiversité, Gières, France.
Thomas EnglederGreen Heart of Europe, Lynx Project Austria Northwest, Haslach an der Mühl, Austria.
Michał FiguraAssociation for Nature "Wolf", Twardorzeczka, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-8367-5828
Christian FuxjägerNationalpark Kalkalpen, Molln, Austria.
Eva GregorovaBojnice Zoological Garden, Bojnice, Slovakia.
Marco HeurichInstitute for Forest and Wildlife Management, Inland Norway University of Applied Sciences, Koppang, Norway.
Sylvia IdelbergerStiftung Natur und Umwelt Rheinland-Pfalz, Mainz, Germany.
Jakub KubalaFaculty of Forestry, Department of Applied Zoology and Wildlife Management, Technical University in Zvolen, Zvolen, Slovakia.
Josip KusakFaculty of Veterinary Medicine, Department Veterinary Biology, University of Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia.
Dime MelovskiMacedonian Ecological Society, Skopje, North Macedonia.
Tomma Lilli MiddelhoffHarz National Park, Wernigerode, Germany.
Tereza MinárikováALKA Wildlife, Dačice, Czech Republic.
Paolo MolinariProgetto Lince Italia, Tarvisio, Italy.ORCID 0009-0009-8556-246X
Lorane Mouzon-MoyneCentre Athenas Wildlife Rescue Center, L'étoile, France.
Gilles MoyneCentre Athenas Wildlife Rescue Center, L'étoile, France.
Robert W MysłajekAssociation for Nature "Wolf", Twardorzeczka, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-9619-2868
Sabina NowakAssociation for Nature "Wolf", Twardorzeczka, Poland.
Janis OzolinsLatvian State Forest Research Institute ''Silava", Salaspils, Latvia.
Andreas RyserStiftung KORA, Ittigen, Switzerland.
Bardh SanajaEnvironmentally Responsible Action ERA, Peja, Kosovo.
Maryna ShkvyriaKyiv zoological park of national importance, Kyiv, Ukraine.
Teodora SinAssociation for the Conservation of Biological Diversity, Focsani, Romania.ORCID 0000-0001-7624-0471
Magda SindičićFaculty of Veterinary Medicine, Department for Game and Wildlife, University of Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia.
Vedran SlijepčevićDepartment of Wildlife Management and Nature Protection, Karlovac University of Applied Sciences, Karlovac, Croatia.
Christian StaufferStiftung KORA, Ittigen, Switzerland.
Branislav TámBojnice Zoological Garden, Bojnice, Slovakia.
Aleksander TrajceProtection and Preservation of Natural Environment in Albania, Tirana, Albania.ORCID 0000-0002-6815-7421
Josefa VolfováDepartment of Nature Protection, Šumava National Park Administration, Kašperské Hory, Czech Republic.
Sybille WölflWildLink Institute, Association Lynx Bavaria, Waldmünchen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-8582-9509
Diana ZlatanovaFaculty of Biology, Department of Zoology and Anthropology, Sofia University "St. Kliment Ohridski", Sofia, Bulgaria.
Kristina VogtStiftung KORA, Ittigen, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-8924-1534

Funding

Austrian Science Fund FWF I 4639
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Rehabilitation of injured or immature individuals has become an increasingly used conservation and management tool. However, scientific evaluation of rehabilitations is rare, raising concern about post-release welfare as well as the cost-effectiveness of spending scarce financial resources. Over the past 20 years, events of juvenile Eurasian lynx presumably orphaned have been observed in many European lynx populations. To guide the management of orphaned lynx, we documented survival, rehabilitation and fate after the release and evaluated the potential relevance of lynx orphan rehabilitation for population management and conservation implications. Data on 320 orphaned lynx was collected from 1975 to 2022 from 13 countries and nine populations. The majority of orphaned lynx (55%) were taken to rehabilitation centres or other enclosures. A total of 66 orphans were released back to nature. The portion of rehabilitated lynx who survived at least one year after release was 0.66. Release location was the best predictor for their survival. Of the 66 released lynx, ten have reproduced at least once (8 females and 2 males). Conservation implications of rehabilitation programmes include managing genetic diversity in small, isolated populations and reintroducing species to historical habitats. The lynx is a perfect model species as most reintroduced populations in Central Europe show significantly lower observed heterozygosity than most of the autochthonous populations, indicating that reintroduction bottlenecks, isolation and post-release management have long-term consequences on the genetic composition of populations. The release of translocated orphans could be a valuable contribution to Eurasian lynx conservation in Europe. It is recommended to release orphans at the distribution edge or in the frame of reintroduction projects instead of a release in the core area of a population where it is not necessary from a demographic and genetic point of view. Rehabilitation programmes can have conservation implications that extend far beyond individual welfare benefits.

Indexed as

LynxAnimalsEcosystemEuropeFemaleHumansMaleRehabilitation Centers

Identifiers

PMID38452124
PMCPMC10919842

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.