Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38451952›Full record

ArticlePloS one2024

Pain management after tonsil surgery in children and adults-A national survey related to pain outcome measures from the Swedish Quality Register for tonsil surgery.

Maria Roskvist, Fredrik Alm, Pia Nerfeldt, Elisabeth Ericsson

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
6.7field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Irreversible Electroporation for Tonsillar Ablation in Adults.Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Maria RoskvistEar-, Nose- and Throat Clinic, County Hospital Mälarsjukhuset Eskilstuna, Sweden.
Fredrik AlmSchool of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden.
Pia NerfeldtDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Karolinska University Hospital and Division of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden.
Elisabeth EricssonSchool of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0001-8549-9039
Örebro University · SEKarolinska University Hospital · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe primary aim of this study was to describe the current practice regarding pain management in relation to tonsil surgery among Ear Nose and Throat (ENT) clinics in Sweden. The secondary aim was to determine the impact of the provider's regime of rescue analgesics on the pain related Patient Reported Outcome Measures (pain-PROMs) from the Swedish Quality Register for Tonsil Surgery (SQTS). MATERIALS &

methodsA descriptive cross-sectional study originating from a validated web-based questionnaire. The survey enrolled one respondent from each ENT clinic (47/48 participated) nationally. Pain-PROMs from the SQTS, recorded from October 2019 to October 2022, were included (8163 tonsil surgeries).

resultsParacetamol was used by all enrolled ENT clinics as preemptive analgesia. The addition of COX inhibitors was used in 40% of the clinics. Betamethasone was usually administered, to prevent pain and nausea (92%). All clinics gave postdischarge instructions on multimodal analgesia with COX inhibitors and paracetamol. Rescue analgesics were prescribed after tonsillectomy for 77% of adults, 62% of older children, 43% of young children and less often after tonsillotomy. The most frequently prescribed rescue analgesic was clonidine in children (55%) and oxycodone in adults (72%). A high proportion of patients reported contact with health care services due to postoperative pain (pain-PROMs/ SQTS). Tonsillectomy procedures were associated with the highest rates of contacts (children/adolescents 13-15%; adults 26%), while tonsillotomy were associated with lower rates, (5-7% of children/adolescents). There was no significant difference in the frequency of health care contacts due to pain regarding whether clinics routinely prescribed rescue analgesics or not after tonsillectomy.

conclusionThe Swedish analgesic regimen after tonsil surgery is good overall. Nevertheless, there is a need for increased awareness and knowledge to achieve optimal patient recovery. Pain-PROM data demonstrate the call for improvement in pain management after tonsil surgery.

Indexed as

Palatine TonsilTonsillectomyAcetaminophenAdolescentAdultAftercareAnalgesicsChildChild, PreschoolCross-Sectional StudiesHumansOutcome Assessment, Health CarePain ManagementPatient DischargePostoperative PainSwedenAcetaminophenAnalgesics

Identifiers

PMID38451952
PMCPMC10919603
OpenAlexW4392564039

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.