Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38451464›Full record

ArticlePhysical and engineering sciences in medicine2024

Development and validation of the effective CNR analysis method for evaluating the contrast resolution of CT images.

Kengo Igarashi, Kuniharu Imai, Shigeru Matsushima, Chiyo Yamauchi-Kawaura, Keisuke Fujii

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Physical and engineering sciences in medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Kengo IgarashiDepartment of Integrated Health Sciences, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, 1-1-20, Daiko-Minami, Higashi-ku, Nagoya, Aichi, 461-8673, Japan. igarashi.kengo.a5@s.mail.nagoya-u.ac.jp.
Kuniharu ImaiDepartment of Integrated Health Sciences, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, 1-1-20, Daiko-Minami, Higashi-ku, Nagoya, Aichi, 461-8673, Japan.
Shigeru MatsushimaDepartment of Integrated Health Sciences, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, 1-1-20, Daiko-Minami, Higashi-ku, Nagoya, Aichi, 461-8673, Japan.
Chiyo Yamauchi-KawauraDepartment of Integrated Health Sciences, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, 1-1-20, Daiko-Minami, Higashi-ku, Nagoya, Aichi, 461-8673, Japan.
Keisuke FujiiDepartment of Integrated Health Sciences, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, 1-1-20, Daiko-Minami, Higashi-ku, Nagoya, Aichi, 461-8673, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Contrast resolution is an important index for evaluating the signal detectability of computed tomographic (CT) images. Recently, various noise reduction algorithms, such as iterative reconstruction (IR) and deep learning reconstruction (DLR), have been proposed to reduce the image noise in CT images. However, these algorithms cause changes in the image noise texture and blurred image signals in CT images. Furthermore, the contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) cannot be accurately evaluated in CT images reconstructed using noise reduction methods. Therefore, in this study, we devised a new method, namely, "effective CNR analysis," for evaluating the contrast resolution of CT images. We verified whether the proposed algorithm could evaluate the effective contrast resolution based on the signal detectability of CT images. The findings showed that the effective CNR values obtained using the proposed method correlated well with the subjective visual impressions of CT images. To investigate whether signal detectability was appropriately evaluated using effective CNR analysis, the conventional CNR analysis method was compared with the proposed method. The CNRs of the IR and DLR images calculated using conventional CNR analysis were 13.2 and 10.7, respectively. By contrast, those calculated using the effective CNR analysis were estimated to be 0.7 and 1.1, respectively. Considering that the signal visibility of DLR images was superior to that of IR images, our proposed effective CNR analysis was shown to be appropriate for evaluating the contrast resolution of CT images.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsImage Processing, Computer-AssistedSignal-To-Noise RatioTomography, X-Ray ComputedHumansPhantoms, ImagingContrast resolutionContrast-to-noise ratioImage noiseStochastic differential equation

Identifiers

PMID38451464
PMCPMC11166862

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.