Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38451385›Full record

ArticleCognitive processing2024

Conflict in moral and nonmoral decision making: an empirical study coupled with a computational model.

Flora Gautheron, Jean-Charles Quinton, Annique Smeding

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Cognitive processing, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Flora GautheronUniv. Grenoble Alpes, Univ. Savoie Mont Blanc, LIP/PC2S, 38000, Grenoble, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2714-8078
Jean-Charles QuintonUniv. Grenoble Alpes, CNRS, Grenoble INP, LJK, 38000, Grenoble, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8118-1752
Annique SmedingUniv. Grenoble Alpes, Univ. Savoie Mont Blanc, LIP/PC2S, 38000, Grenoble, France. annique.smeding@univ-smb.fr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7743-9578

Funding

Agence Nationale de la Recherche ANR-11-LABX-0025-01Agence Nationale de la Recherche ANR-15-IDEX-02
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

While moral psychology research has extensively studied decision making using moral dilemmas, such high-conflict situations may not fully represent all moral decisions. Moreover, most studies on the effect of conflict have focused on nonmoral decisions, and it is unclear how it applies to the moral realm. The present mixed-method research investigates how conflict impacts moral compared to nonmoral decision making. In a preregistered empirical study (

Indexed as

Conflict, PsychologicalDecision MakingMoralsAdultComputer SimulationFemaleHumansMaleModels, PsychologicalYoung AdultConflictDynamic neural field modelMoral decision-makingMouse-tracking

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.